Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12879083›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2003

A systematic review of protein and energy supplementation for hip fracture aftercare in older people.

A Avenell, H H G Handoll

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. From risk marker to life-saver: clinical promise of the albumin hemoglobin index in geriatric hip fractures.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Public health impact of osteoporosis.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2013
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A AvenellHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. a.avenell@abdn.ac.uk
H H G Handoll
Edinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate whether protein and energy supplementation influences recovery after hip fracture.

designSystematic review of randomised and quasi-randomised trials in people aged 65 y and over. DATA SOURCES: We searched seven electronic databases from 1966 to April 2002, four journals and reference lists of relevant articles. We contacted trial investigators and experts for details of other trials.

main outcome measuresMortality, complications and unfavourable outcome (mortality or survivors with complications) were the primary outcomes. We also sought data on length of hospital stay, functional status after hip fracture, quality of life and compliance with supplementation.

resultsIn total, 12 randomised trials involving 898 participants were included. Nine trials evaluated protein and energy supplementation (five oral and four nasogastric feeding), and a further three trials tested oral protein supplementation. Potential biases resulting from inadequate allocation concealment and lack of assessor blinding and intention-to-treat analysis, as well as the limited outcome data, mean that the results must be interpreted with caution. Pooled data from eight of the nine trials evaluating protein and energy supplements showed no evidence for an effect on mortality (relative risk 0.92, 95% CI 0.56-1.50). Limited data from only three trials showed that oral protein and energy supplements may reduce unfavourable outcome (relative risk 0.52, 95% CI 0.32-0.84).

conclusionBased on limited evidence, oral protein and energy supplementation after hip fracture may reduce unfavourable outcome. Further evidence from good-quality randomised trials is required to inform clinical practice.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeAgedDietary ProteinsDietary SupplementsFemaleHip FracturesHumansLength of StayMaleMalnutritionNutritional SupportOdds RatioPatient CompliancePostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDietary Proteins

Identifiers

PMID12879083
OpenAlexW2004696881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.