Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12878839›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2003

Cell cycle regulation to repair the infarcted myocardium.

Joshua D Dowell, Loren J Field, Kishore B S Pasumarthi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Harnessing the power of dividing cardiomyocytes.Global cardiology science & practice · 2013
    Review
  5. Prometheus's heart: what lies beneath.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2012
    Article
  6. Myocyte proliferation in the developing heart.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2011
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cardiac repair by embryonic stem-derived cells.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2006
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Joshua D DowellWells Center for Pediatric Research and Krannert Institute of Cardiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5225, USA.
Loren J Field
Kishore B S Pasumarthi
Indiana University School of Medicine

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lower vertebrates such as newt and zebrafish are able to reactivate high levels of cardiomyocyte cell cycle activity in response to experimental injury resulting in apparent regeneration. In contrast, damaged myocardium is replaced by fibrotic scar tissue in higher vertebrates. This process compromises the contractile function of the surviving myocardium, ultimately leading to heart failure. Various strategies are being pursued to augment myocyte number in the diseased hearts. One approach entails the reactivation of cell cycle in surviving cardiomyocytes. Here, we provide a summary of methods to monitor cell cycle activity, and interventions demonstrating positive cell cycle effects in cardiomyocytes as well as discuss the potential utility of cell cycle regulation to augment myocyte number in diseased hearts.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleCell DifferentiationCell SurvivalDown-RegulationHumansMyocardial InfarctionMyocytes, CardiacRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID12878839
OpenAlexW2263420129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.