Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12878828›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2003

Cardiomyocyte transplantation into the failing heart-new therapeutic approach for heart failure?

Thorsten Reffelmann, Jonathan Leor, Jochen Müller-Ehmsen, Larry Kedes, Robert A Kloner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thorsten ReffelmannThe Heart Institute, Good Samaritan Hospital, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90017-2395, USA.
Jonathan Leor
Jochen Müller-Ehmsen
Larry Kedes
Robert A Kloner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure, frequently the consequence of irreversible myocardial damage with subsequent formation of akinetic scar tissue, is a highly prevalent disease, and in its advanced stages associated with high mortality. The transplantation of exogenous cells with the inherent ability to contract has been put forward as one potential treatment strategy to increase contractility and cardiac performance. Besides skeletal myoblasts or stem cells from various sources, immature cardiomyocytes, such as fetal or neonatal cardiomyocytes, have been transplanted into normal, cryoinjured, infarcted myocardium, as well as into models of global heart failure. Survival of transplanted immature cardiomyocytes has been demonstrated up to 6-7 months, accompanied by vascularization of the grafted tissue. Transplants developed sarcomeric structures and other morphological features of differentiation. The principal possibility of cell-to-cell coupling between graft and host cells was demonstrated after cardiomyocyte transplantation into normal hearts and in some studies in damaged myocardium. But most long-term follow-up investigations in models of myocardial infarction reported that optimal integration of the engrafted cells appeared to be hindered by scar tissue, separating the transplant from the host. Nonetheless, in several studies, improved parameters of cardiac performance were demonstrated ex-vivo and in vivo. Potential mechanisms might involve beneficial effects on the remodeling process. In this review, we critically evaluate the potential value of cardiomyocyte transplantation as a new approach in the treatment of the syndrome of "heart failure".

Indexed as

Cell TransplantationAnimalsFetal HeartFetal Tissue TransplantationHeart FailureHumansIncidenceMyocardial ContractionMyocytes, CardiacNecrosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.