Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12877254›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2003

Molecular analysis of the androgen receptor gene in Hong Kong Chinese infertile men.

J Y M Tse, V W S Liu, W S B Yeung, E Y L Lau, E H Y Ng, P C Ho

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Androgen receptor (EXCLI journal · 2018
    Article
  6. Semen Quality, Hormonal Levels, and Androgen Receptor Gene Polymorphisms in a Population of Young Male Volunteers from Two Different Regions of Poland.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J Y M TseDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China. jymtse@yahoo.com.hk
V W S Liu
W S B Yeung
E Y L Lau
E H Y Ng
P C Ho
University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the relationship between CAG repeat length in the androgen receptor gene and impaired spermatogenesis in Hong Kong Chinese population.

methodsThe CAG repeat region was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 85 nonobstructive azoospermic or severe oligozoospermic men, and 45 fertile males. The number of CAG repeat was analyzed by DNA sequencing. Serum FSH, LH, and testosterone levels were also determined in these men.

resultsAmong nonobstructive azoospermic males, three men (5.7%) possessed short CAG repeats (< 16), and three (5.7%) other men possessed long CAG repeats (> 30). Short CAG repeats (< 16) were also found in two severe oligozoospermic males (6.3%). The incidence of infertile men with short or long CAG repeats is significantly higher in the azoospermic group (p = 0.03) but not in the severe oligozoospermic group (p = 0.17) when compared with the fertile controls

conclusionOur data suggest an association between CAG repeat lengths and impaired spermatogenesis in azoospermic males in our population.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAsian PeopleFertilityHong KongHumansInfertility, MaleMaleMiddle AgedOligospermiaReceptors, AndrogenSpermatogenesisTrinucleotide RepeatsReceptors, Androgen

Identifiers

PMID12877254
PMCPMC3455324
OpenAlexW1600968738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.