Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12873814›Full record

Trial reportJournal of hepatology2003

Spironolactone alone or in combination with furosemide in the treatment of moderate ascites in nonazotemic cirrhosis. A randomized comparative study of efficacy and safety.

Justiniano Santos, Ramon Planas, Albert Pardo, Rosa Durández, Eduard Cabré, Rosa Maria Morillas, Maria Luisa Granada, José Angel Jiménez, Enrique Quintero, Miquel Angel Gassull

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of hepatology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05999773 active not recruitingstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Potential Role of Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Ascites in Cirrhotic Patients

Ran2023Enrolled40Registered outcomes18Posted comparisons0ConditionsAscites Hepatic, Cirrhosis, Liver, Diabete Type 2ArmsSGLT2 inhibitor
Open the trial in the graph
NCT00741663 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2005, after this paper: background citation

Phase 4 Study on the Comparison Between Combined Versus Sequential Diuretic Treatment of Moderate Ascites in Nonazotemic Patients With Cirrhosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PadovaRan2005 to 2008Enrolled100ConditionsCirrhosis, AscitesArmsSpironolactone and furosemide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 177 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Refractory Ascites and the Alfapump.Gastro hep advances · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Update on the Complications and Management of Liver Cirrhosis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. [Hemodynamic Changes in Chronic Liver Disease].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Justiniano SantosDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitari Germans Tri;as i Pujol, Carretera del Canyet, s/n, 08916, Badalona, Spain.
Ramon Planas
Albert Pardo
Rosa Durández
Eduard Cabré
Rosa Maria Morillas
Maria Luisa Granada
José Angel Jiménez
Enrique Quintero
Miquel Angel Gassull
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol · ESHospital Universitario de Canarias · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsThe most rational treatment of moderate ascites is spironolactone alone or in combination with furosemide. However, it is unknown which of these two treatment schedules is preferable.

methodsOne hundred nonazotemic cirrhotic patients with moderate ascites were randomly assigned to be treated with spironolactone and furosemide (Group 1: 50 patients) or with spironolactone alone (Group 2: 50 patients). If no response was obtained, the doses of diuretics were increased up to 400 mg/day of spironolactone and 160 mg/day of furosemide. In patients of group 2 not responding to 400 mg/day of spironolactone, furosemide was added. In cases with an excessive response, the dosage of diuretics was reduced.

resultsThe response rate (98% in Group 1 vs. 94% in Group 2), the rapidity of ascites mobilization and the incidence of complications induced by diuretic therapy was similar in both groups. The need to reduce the diuretic dosage was significantly higher in Group 1 than Group 2 (68% vs. 34%; P=0.002).

conclusionsIn the treatment of moderate ascites, spironolactone alone seems to be as safe and effective as spironolactone associated with furosemide. Since spironolactone alone requires less dose adjustment, it would be more suitable for treating ascites on an outpatient basis.

Indexed as

AgedAscitesDiureticsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFurosemideHumansLiver CirrhosisMaleMiddle AgedSpironolactoneTreatment OutcomeDiureticsFurosemideSpironolactone

Identifiers

PMID12873814
OpenAlexW2009366798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.