ReviewImmunologic research1992
Eosinophil IgE receptor and CD23.
Review in Immunologic research, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The association between eosinophils (CD16Dermatology and therapy · 2023Article
- Review
- Impact of Plasma Membrane Domains on IgG Fc Receptor Function.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
- CD23/FcεRII: molecular multi-tasking.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2010Review
- The biology and pathology of Fc receptors.Journal of clinical immunology · 1993Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the present review, eosinophil Fc epsilon RII was compared to CD23, a differentiation marker of B cells. Biochemical analysis revealed that molecules of similar molecular weight were immunoprecipitated from eosinophils and B cells by an anti-CD23 monoclonal antibody (mAb) or by BB10, and anti-eosinophil Fc epsilon RII. By flow cytometry, a correlation was found between the binding of anti-CD23 mAb and myeloma IgE. However, a low expression of different epitopes of CD23 was observed in various hypereosinophilic patients. Northern blot analysis of eosinophil RNA with the cDNA probe of CD23 revealed a weak message in only 3 of the 6 patients expressing membrane CD23. The inhibition by anti-CD23 mAbs of IgE-mediated cytotoxicity and IgE binding to eosinophils clearly indicated the participation of CD23 or a related molecule in IgE-dependent eosinophil functions. However, the differential effects of anti-CD23 mAbs on eosinophils and B cells suggest major differences in the characteristics of the molecule expressed by eosinophils and by B cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.