Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12860929›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental medicine2003

CD4+ T cell polarization in mice is modulated by strain-specific major histocompatibility complex-independent differences within dendritic cells.

Christophe Filippi, Stephanie Hugues, Julie Cazareth, Valerie Julia, Nicolas Glaichenhaus, Sophie Ugolini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental medicine, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Myocardial-Treg Crosstalk: How to Tame a Wolf.Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. TheFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. IL-17 promotes progression of cutaneous leishmaniasis in susceptible mice.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2009
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christophe FilippiE03-44, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis, 660 Route des Lucioles, 06560 Valbonne, France.
Stephanie Hugues
Julie Cazareth
Valerie Julia
Nicolas Glaichenhaus
Sophie Ugolini

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resistance and susceptibility to Leishmania major in mice are determined by multiple genes and correlate with the preferential development of Th1 and Th2 responses, respectively. Here, we found that CD11b+ dendritic cells (DCs) prime parasite-specific CD4+ T cells in both susceptible BALB/c (H2-d) and resistant B10.D2 (H2-d) mice. However, BALB/c and B10.D2 DCs from L. major-infected mice differ in their ability to polarize naive T cells into Th1 or Th2 effector cells. This difference is cell-intrinsic, is not restricted to H2-d mice, and is observed with both parasite-specific and allospecific CD4+ T cells. Thus, strain-specific differences within CD11b+ DCs influence the ability of inbred mice to mount polarized CD4+ T cell responses.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCell PolarityCytokinesDendritic CellsDisease SusceptibilityHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIImmunity, InnateLeishmaniasis, CutaneousMajor Histocompatibility ComplexMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred StrainsRNA, MessengerSpecies SpecificityTh1 CellsCytokinesHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID12860929
PMCPMC2194066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.