Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12859219›Full record

ReviewPharmacoEconomics2003

The impact of treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease on health-related quality of life: a literature review.

Manishi Prasad, Anne M Rentz, Dennis A Revicki

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in PharmacoEconomics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Dynamics of quality of life improvement after floppy Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2015
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gastro-esophageal reflux disease: the recent trend in Japan.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2008
    Article
  10. Impact of PPIs on patient focused symptomatology in GERD.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2008
    Article
  11. Strategy for treatment of nonerosive reflux disease in Asia.World journal of gastroenterology · 2008
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Patient reported outcomes in gastroesophageal reflux disease: an overview of available measures.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2005
    Review
  15. Development and psychometric evaluation of the patient assessment of upper gastrointestinal symptom severity index (PAGI-SYM) in patients with upper gastrointestinal disorders.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manishi PrasadMEDTAP International, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA. Prasad@medtap.com
Anne M Rentz
Dennis A Revicki

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is common in the general population and is diagnosed based on patient-reported symptoms and clinical tests. Although clinical tests are available, significant percentages of patients report symptoms of heartburn and reflux despite negative endoscopies, and 24-hour pH tests are not often used by primary-care physicians in diagnosis. Consequently, patient-reported symptoms and health-related QOL (HR-QOL) are important in assessing treatment outcome. HR-QOL is significantly impaired in patients with GORD, and HR-QOL is associated with symptom severity and changes in GORD-related symptoms. The objective of this literature review is to examine the impact of pharmacological treatment on HR-QOL in patients with GORD. Generic and disease-specific HR-QOL measures have been used in clinical trials to evaluate the impact of GORD on patient functioning and well-being. The Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB) Index and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) have been used in several clinical trials of treatment for GORD and have consistently shown that HR-QOL improves with successful therapy. These trials have been conducted primarily with two pharmacological agents, omeprazole and ranitidine. On the Heartburn-specific Quality of Life questionnaire, patients treated with ranitidine reported better HR-QOL after treatment compared with placebo therapy. In two clinical trials where omeprazole and ranitidine were compared, patients treated with omeprazole reported significantly better HR-QOL (based on the PGWB Index) than those treated with ranitidine; however, 2 other trials did not detect significant differences between the treatments. Results from clinical trials using disease-specific measures (Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index [GIQLI] and Heartburn-specific Quality of Life questionnaire) demonstrate similar findings, supporting the association between treatment-related symptom resolution and improvements in HR-QOL. The GIQLI was used in a trial comparing pantoprazole and ranitidine, where results favoured pantoprazole therapy. Several studies have demonstrated that resolution of GORD symptoms is associated with improvement in HR-QOL. Although there is evidence that treatment for GORD does improve symptoms and HR-QOL outcomes, further research is needed to more completely understand the value of medical therapy for GORD.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSickness Impact ProfileDrug EvaluationGastroesophageal RefluxHistamine H2 AntagonistsHumansOmeprazoleProton PumpsRanitidineTreatment OutcomeHistamine H2 AntagonistsOmeprazoleProton PumpsRanitidine

Identifiers

PMID12859219
OpenAlexW1970356238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.