ArticleBone marrow transplantation2003
Micrometastases in apheresis products predict shorter progression-free and overall survival in patients with breast cancer undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT).
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Minimal detectable disease confirmed by flow cytometry and poor outcome after autologous stem cell transplantation in peripheral T-Cell lymphomas.Bone marrow transplantation · 2016Article
- Circulating tumor cells in breast cancer.Journal of carcinogenesis · 2014Review
- Prognostic Value of EMT-Circulating Tumor Cells in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing High-Dose Chemotherapy with Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Journal of Cancer · 2012Article
- Incidence and prognostic value of tumour cells detected by RT-PCR in peripheral blood stem cell collections from patients with Ewing tumour.British journal of cancer · 2006Article
- Biological purging of breast cancer cell lines using a replication-competent oncolytic virus in human stem cell autografts.Bone marrow transplantation · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The presence of cancer cells in autografts of breast cancer patients has been described to have prognostic value or directly lead to relapse. Previously, we demonstrated that apheresis products (APs) collected after induction chemotherapy have a significantly lower likelihood of tumor cell contamination. Here, we examine the prognostic value of micrometastases in autografts. Data from 83 patients with breast cancer treated with autologous blood stem cell transplantation were analyzed. Pan-cytokeratin-FITC conjugated antibodies were used to detect contaminating breast cancer cells in the APs. Progression and survival data analyzed on the basis of three or fewer cancer cells showed no significant differences in outcomes. Of the 83 patients, 11 had more than three cancer cells detectable in their APs. In total, 72 patients were shown to have less than three cells detectable. When patients with more than three cells were compared to patients with 0-3, we found statistically significant differences in progression-free survival. We also found a significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the two groups. No difference was observed in OS since the time of diagnosis. We conclude that patients with more than three contaminating cells in their APs have micrometastases and represent a poor prognosis group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.