ReviewPlant physiology2003
Computational approaches to identify promoters and cis-regulatory elements in plant genomes.
Review in Plant physiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
71 citing papers in PubMed, 220 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Advantaged Salt Inducible Suaeda salsa SsNRT2.5 and Its Promoter Significantly Enhance Nitrate Transport Efficiency and Salt Tolerance in Transgenic Arabidopsis and Rice.Plant biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Synthetic promoter design in plants: integration of computational and experimental approaches.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Genome-wide analysis of Triticum aestivum bromodomain gene family and expression analysis under salt stress.Planta · 2024Article
- A Blue Light-Responsive Strong Synthetic Promoter Based on Rational Design inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Genome-wide analysis and characterization of the LRR-RLK gene family provides insights into anthracnose resistance in common bean.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Genome-Wide Identification of 2-Oxoglutarate and Fe (II)-Dependent Dioxygenase (2ODD-C) Family Genes and Expression Profiles under Different Abiotic Stresses inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Promoter activity and transcriptome analyses decipher functions of CgbHLH001 gene (Chenopodium glaucum L.) in response to abiotic stress.BMC plant biology · 2023Article
- Overview of Repressive miRNA Regulation by Short Tandem Target Mimic (STTM): Applications and Impact on Plant Biology.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Comparative expression analysis ofPeerJ · 2023Article
- Isolation and characterization of drought and ABA responsive promoter of a transcription factor encoding gene from rice.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2022Article
- BLSSpeller to discover novel regulatory motifs in maize.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2022Article
- Characterization of sucrose binding protein as a seed-specific promoter in transgenic tobacco Nicotiana tabacum L.PloS one · 2022Article
- An expanded role for the transcription factorFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Identification ofPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021Article
- Comprehensive analysis and identification of drought-responsive candidate NAC genes in three semi-arid tropics (SAT) legume crops.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Isolation of novel citrus and plum fruit promoters and their functional characterization for fruit biotechnology.BMC biotechnology · 2020Article
- Epigenetic diversity of3 Biotech · 2020Article
- Cis-Regulatory Code for Predicting Plant Cell-Type Transcriptional Response to High Salinity.Plant physiology · 2019Article
- Evolutionary conservation of MLO gene promoter signatures.BMC plant biology · 2019Article
- Genome wide analysis of W-box element in Arabidopsis thaliana reveals TGAC motif with genes down regulated by heat and salinity.Scientific reports · 2019Article
11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The identification of promoters and their regulatory elements is one of the major challenges in bioinformatics and integrates comparative, structural, and functional genomics. Many different approaches have been developed to detect conserved motifs in a set of genes that are either coregulated or orthologous. However, although recent approaches seem promising, in general, unambiguous identification of regulatory elements is not straightforward. The delineation of promoters is even harder, due to its complex nature, and in silico promoter prediction is still in its infancy. Here, we review the different approaches that have been developed for identifying promoters and their regulatory elements. We discuss the detection of cis-acting regulatory elements using word-counting or probabilistic methods (so-called "search by signal" methods) and the delineation of promoters by considering both sequence content and structural features ("search by content" methods). As an example of search by content, we explored in greater detail the association of promoters with CpG islands. However, due to differences in sequence content, the parameters used to detect CpG islands in humans and other vertebrates cannot be used for plants. Therefore, a preliminary attempt was made to define parameters that could possibly define CpG and CpNpG islands in Arabidopsis, by exploring the compositional landscape around the transcriptional start site. To this end, a data set of more than 5,000 gene sequences was built, including the promoter region, the 5'-untranslated region, and the first introns and coding exons. Preliminary analysis shows that promoter location based on the detection of potential CpG/CpNpG islands in the Arabidopsis genome is not straightforward. Nevertheless, because the landscape of CpG/CpNpG islands differs considerably between promoters and introns on the one side and exons (whether coding or not) on the other, more sophisticated approaches can probably be developed for the successful detection of "putative" CpG and CpNpG islands in plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.