Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12857779›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2003

Mycotoxins.

J W Bennett, M Klich

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 871 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
871citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
48.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

871 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3,039 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Aflatoxin exposure and health impacts: global burden and advances in detection technologies.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Occurrence and Co-Occurrence of Regulated and Emerging Mycotoxins in Foods Marketed to U.S. Toddlers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Toxins · 2026
    Review
  20. Article

811 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J W BennettDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118, USA. jbennett@tulane.edu
M Klich
Southern Regional Research Center · USTulane University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by microfungi that are capable of causing disease and death in humans and other animals. Because of their pharmacological activity, some mycotoxins or mycotoxin derivatives have found use as antibiotics, growth promotants, and other kinds of drugs; still others have been implicated as chemical warfare agents. This review focuses on the most important ones associated with human and veterinary diseases, including aflatoxin, citrinin, ergot akaloids, fumonisins, ochratoxin A, patulin, trichothecenes, and zearalenone.

Indexed as

AflatoxinsAir Pollution, IndoorAnimalsBioterrorismCitrininErgot AlkaloidsFood MicrobiologyFumonisinsHumansMycotoxinsTrichothecenesZearalenoneAflatoxinsCitrininErgot AlkaloidsFumonisinsMycotoxinsTrichothecenesZearalenone

Identifiers

PMID12857779
PMCPMC164220
OpenAlexW4211237594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.