Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12857774›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2003

Receptors, mediators, and mechanisms involved in bacterial sepsis and septic shock.

Edwin S Van Amersfoort, Theo J C Van Berkel, Johan Kuiper

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 227 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
227citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

227 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 744 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Toxins turned into medicines: A systematic review of peptide animal-derived venom in wound treatments.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. EnhancedInfection and immunity · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Effect of Enteric-Derived Lipopolysaccharides on Obesity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Eliminating Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) Using Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB).Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

167 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edwin S Van AmersfoortDivision of Biopharmaceutics, Leiden/Amsterdam Center of Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Theo J C Van Berkel
Johan Kuiper
Leiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial sepsis and septic shock result from the overproduction of inflammatory mediators as a consequence of the interaction of the immune system with bacteria and bacterial wall constituents in the body. Bacterial cell wall constituents such as lipopolysaccharide, peptidoglycans, and lipoteichoic acid are particularly responsible for the deleterious effects of bacteria. These constituents interact in the body with a large number of proteins and receptors, and this interaction determines the eventual inflammatory effect of the compounds. Within the circulation bacterial constituents interact with proteins such as plasma lipoproteins and lipopolysaccharide binding protein. The interaction of the bacterial constituents with receptors on the surface of mononuclear cells is mainly responsible for the induction of proinflammatory mediators by the bacterial constituents. The role of individual receptors such as the toll-like receptors and CD14 in the induction of proinflammatory cytokines and adhesion molecules is discussed in detail. In addition, the roles of a number of other receptors that bind bacterial compounds such as scavenger receptors and their modulating role in inflammation are described. Finally, the therapies for the treatment of bacterial sepsis and septic shock are discussed in relation to the action of the aforementioned receptors and proteins.

Indexed as

Acute-Phase ProteinsMembrane GlycoproteinsBacteremiaCarrier ProteinsCD18 AntigensCytokinesHumansImmune ToleranceKupffer CellsLipid ALipopolysaccharide-Binding ProteinLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsLipopolysaccharidesLipoproteinsShock, SepticAcute-Phase ProteinsCarrier ProteinsCD18 AntigensCytokinesLipid ALipopolysaccharide-Binding ProteinLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsLipopolysaccharidesLipoproteinsMembrane Glycoproteins

Identifiers

PMID12857774
PMCPMC164216
OpenAlexW2131392583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.