Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12856150›Full record

ReviewCurrent genetics2003

Revamp a model-status and prospects of the Dictyostelium genome project.

Ludwig Eichinger

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current genetics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ludwig EichingerCenter for Biochemistry, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Joseph-Stelzmann-Strasse 52, 50931, Köln, Germany. Ludwig.eichinger@uni-koeln.de
University of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

International efforts are underway that aim at determining the complete genome sequence of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. As strategy, a whole chromosome shotgun (WCS) approach was chosen and each of the six Dictyostelium chromosomes was assigned to project partners. The project is well advanced, chromosome 2 was recently published, and it is expected that the sequences of chromosomes 1 and 6 and a gene catalogue for the complete genome will be available at the end of this year. The genome sequence, together with powerful molecular genetic tools, will undoubtedly further accelerate Dictyostelium research into a number of fundamental biological processes that are common to a wide range of eukaryotes. Furthermore, it will constitute the basis for genome-wide functional analyses. The integration of results from these studies should ultimately lead to a better understanding of the complex networks that govern cellular behavior and development.

Indexed as

Genome, ProtozoanPhylogenyAnimalsChromosomesDictyosteliumDisease Models, AnimalGenetic TechniquesOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID12856150
OpenAlexW2089251481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.