Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12856119›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2003

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sequential intravenous and subcutaneous teicoplanin in critically ill patients without vasopressors.

A Barbot, N Venisse, F Rayeh, S Bouquet, B Debaene, O Mimoz

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. When and How to Use Subcutaneous Antibiotics.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A BarbotDépartement d'Anesthésie-Réanimation Chirurgicale, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire, Cité de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers Cedex, France.
N Venisse
F Rayeh
S Bouquet
B Debaene
O Mimoz
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the pharmacokinetic parameters of sequential intravenous and subcutaneous teicoplanin in the plasma of surgical intensive care unit patients. DESIGN AND

settingProspective, randomized, crossover study in the surgical ICU of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twelve patients with a suspected nosocomial infection, a serum albumin level higher than 10 g/l, body mass index less than 28 kg/m(2), and estimated creatinine clearance higher than 70 ml/min.

interventionsTeicoplanin was first administered intravenously as a loading dose of 6 mg/kg per 12 h for 48 h and then continued at a daily dose of 6 mg/kg. On the fourth day patients were randomized in two groups according to the order of the pharmacokinetic studies. MEASUREMENTS AND

resultsSerial plasma samples were obtained to measure teicoplanin levels. Compared with a 30-min intravenous infusion the peak concentration of teicoplanin after a 30-min subcutaneous administration occurred later (median 7 h, range 5-18) and was lower (16 micro g/ml, 9-31; vs. 73, 53-106). Despite large and unpredictable interindividual differences no significant differences between subcutaneous and intravenous administration were observed in: trough antibiotic concentrations (10 micro g/ml, 6-24; vs. 9, 5-30), the area under the teicoplanin plasma concentration vs. time curves from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24h); 309 micro g/ml per minute, 180-640; vs. 369, 171-955), the proportion of the dosing interval during which the plasma teicoplanin concentration exceeded 10 micro g/ml (96%, 0-100%; vs. 79%, 13-100%), and the ratio of AUC(0-24h) to 10 (77, 45-160; vs. 92, 43-239).

conclusionsIn critically ill patients without vasopressors a switch to the subcutaneous teicoplanin after an initial intravenous therapy seems to give comparable pharmacodynamic indexes of therapeutic success.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAlbuminsAnti-Bacterial AgentsArea Under CurveCritical IllnessCross InfectionCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousInfusions, ParenteralInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMetabolic Clearance RateAlbuminsAnti-Bacterial AgentsTeicoplaninVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID12856119
OpenAlexW2058796966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.