ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2003
Women need better information about routine mammography.
Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of invitation letter in language of origin on screening attendance: randomised controlled trial in BreastScreen Norway.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023Trial
- What is the point: will screening mammography save my life?BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2009Trial
- To Consent or Not to Consent to Screening, That Is the Question.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The role of communication in breast cancer screening: a qualitative study with Australian experts.BMC cancer · 2015Article
- Preconceptions influence women's perceptions of information on breast cancer screening: a qualitative study.BMC research notes · 2015Article
- A Review on Automatic Mammographic Density and Parenchymal Segmentation.International journal of breast cancer · 2015Review
- Overdetection in breast cancer screening: development and preliminary evaluation of a decision aid.BMJ open · 2014Article
- An abnormal screening mammogram causes more anxiety than a palpable lump in benign breast disease.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2012Article
- The breast screening programme and misinforming the public.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2011Review
- Effect of previous benign breast biopsy on the interpretive performance of subsequent screening mammography.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2010Article
- How does age affect baseline screening mammography performance measures? A decision model.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2008Article
- The ethics of information: absolute risk reduction and patient understanding of screening.Journal of general internal medicine · 2008Article
- Social patterning of screening uptake and the impact of facilitating informed choices: psychological and ethical analyses.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2008Article
- Communicating with women about mammography.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2007Article
- Cumulative false positive recall rate and association with participant related factors in a population based breast cancer screening programme.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2006Article
- Ramifications of screening for breast cancer: more debate and better information still needed.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Article
- Screening for breast cancer.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Article
- "What does this mean?" How Web-based consumer health information fails to support information seeking in the pursuit of informed consent for screening test decisions.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2005Article
- Model of outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005Article
- Breast cancer screening services: trade-offs in quality, capacity, outreach, and centralization.Health care management science · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.