Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12851772›Full record

ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2003

[New pharmacological treatment concepts for overactive bladder].

M C Michel

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

M C MichelAbteilung Pharmakologie und Pharmakotherapie, Universität, Amsterdam, Netherlands. m.c.michel@amc.uva.nl
University of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscarinic receptor antagonists such as oxybutynin, propiverine, tolterodine, or trospium are the basis of medical treatment for overactive bladder. While they are moderately efficacious, their use can be limited by adverse effects such as dry mouth. This has sparked the search for new treatment options. Vanilloid receptor agonists, tachykinin receptor antagonists, potassium channel openers, and beta(3)-adrenoceptor agonists are currently under investigation, but are unlikely to become clinically available in the next few years. Therefore, current attempts to optimize treatment focus on improvement of existing drugs by new pharmaceutical formulations. Indeed, extended release formulations of oxybutynin (not available in Germany) or tolterodine have demonstrated an improved tolerability in clinical studies which was accompanied by an efficacy at least equal to that of their standard formulations.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-3 Receptor AgonistsClinical Trials as TopicDelayed-Action PreparationsDrugs, InvestigationalHumansMuscarinic AntagonistsMuscle HypertoniaPotassium ChannelsReceptors, DrugReceptors, TachykininTreatment OutcomeUrinary Bladder, NeurogenicUrinary IncontinenceAdrenergic beta-3 Receptor AgonistsDelayed-Action PreparationsDrugs, InvestigationalMuscarinic AntagonistsPotassium ChannelsReceptors, DrugReceptors, Tachykinin

Identifiers

PMID12851772
OpenAlexW2035555974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.