Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12848836›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2003

Trust, benefit, satisfaction, and burden: a randomized controlled trial to reduce cancer risk through African-American churches.

Giselle Corbie-Smith, Alice S Ammerman, Mira L Katz, Diane Marie M St George, Connie Blumenthal, Chanetta Washington, Benita Weathers, Thomas C Keyserling, Boyd Switzer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Building a "Deep Fund of Good Will": Reframing Research Engagement.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2016
    Article
  15. Recruiting underserved mothers to medical research: findings from North Carolina.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giselle Corbie-SmithDepartment of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Wing D. CB#7240, Chapel Hill, NC 27599. gcorbie@med.unc.edu
Alice S Ammerman
Mira L Katz
Diane Marie M St George
Connie Blumenthal
Chanetta Washington
Benita Weathers
Thomas C Keyserling
Boyd Switzer
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USWalden University · US

Funding

NCI DIETARY GUIDELINES IN AFRICAN AMERICAN CHURCHESR01CA073981 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SWITZER, BOYD R · 1996 to 2000
$694k
BARRIERS TO AFRICAN AMERICAN PARTICIPATION IN RESEARCHK01HL004039 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CORBIE-SMITH, GISELLE · 1999 to 2003
$570k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA73981NCI NIH HHS R01 CA73981-50651NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL004039NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL04039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches that actively engage communities in a study are assumed to lead to relevant findings, trusting relationships, and greater satisfaction with the research process.

objectiveTo examine community members' perceptions of trust, benefit, satisfaction, and burden associated with their participation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsA randomized controlled trial tested a cancer prevention intervention in members of African-American churches. Data were collected at baseline and 1-year follow-up. MEASUREMENTS: Subscales measured perception of trust in the research project and the project team, benefit from involvement with the project, satisfaction with the project and the team, and perception of burden associated with participation. MAIN

resultsOverall, we found high levels of trust, perceived benefit, and satisfaction, and low perceived burden among community members in Partnership to Reach African Americans to Increase Smart Eating. In bivariate analyses, participants in the intervention group reported more perceived benefit and trust (P <.05). Participants in smaller churches reported more benefit, satisfaction and trust, while participants from churches without recent health activities perceived greater benefit, greater satisfaction, and lower burden with the project and the team (P <.05). Participants whose pastors had less educational attainment noted higher benefit and satisfaction; those whose pastors were making personal lifestyle changes noted higher benefit and satisfaction, but also reported higher burden (P <.05).

conclusionsA randomized clinical trial designed with a CBPR approach was associated with high levels of trust and a perceived benefit of satisfaction with the research process. Understanding variations in responses to a research partnership will be helpful in guiding the design and implementation of future CBPR efforts.

Indexed as

Community-Institutional RelationsCommunity ParticipationReligionBlack or African AmericanEducational StatusHealth EducationHealth Services ResearchHumansNeoplasmsTrust

Identifiers

PMID12848836
PMCPMC1494890
OpenAlexW2018220024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.