Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12847036›Full record

ReviewCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2003

Why most interventions to improve physician prescribing do not seem to work.

Sumit R Majumdar, Stephen B Soumerai

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCommentReview
In one paragraph

Review in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04142645 (Pilot Study of the OptiMEDs Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04142645 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Study of the OptiMEDs Intervention: a Complex Intervention for Multidisciplinary Medication Review (Including Nurses, Pharmacists, and Physicians) in Nursing Homes, With ICT-support for the Evaluation of the Appropriateness of Prescribing and for Side-effect Monitoring

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity GhentRan2019 to 2020Enrolled148ConditionsMedication Review, Nursing Home Resident, Nursing HomeArmsOptiMEDs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. A randomized trial of a mailed intervention and self-scheduling to improve osteoporosis screening in postmenopausal women.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2012
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Canadian Quality Circle pilot project in osteoporosis: rationale, methods, and feasibility.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2007
    Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Interventions by pharmacists in out-patient pharmaceutical care.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2014
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sumit R MajumdarDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Walter Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, Edmonton, Alta. me2.majumdar@ualberta.ca
Stephen B Soumerai

Funding

PHS HHS U18H510391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AgedCommunity Pharmacy ServicesDrug PrescriptionsDrug Therapy, CombinationDrug Utilization ReviewFamily PracticeHumansPharmacistsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Total Quality Management

Identifiers

PMID12847036
PMCPMC164939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.