Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12846589›Full record

ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2003

Oxygen uptake kinetic response to exercise in children.

Samantha Fawkner, Neil Armstrong

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Changes in VOFrontiers in physiology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Oxygen uptake kinetics in trained adolescent females.European journal of applied physiology · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Can We Confidently Study VO2 Kinetics in Young People?Journal of sports science & medicine · 2007
    Review
  19. Muscle fatigue during high-intensity exercise in children.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2006
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Samantha FawknerSchool of Sport and Health Sciences, Children's Health and Exercise Research Centre, University of Exeter, Heavitree Road, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK.
Neil Armstrong

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The oxygen uptake (.VO2) kinetic response to exercise assesses the integrated response of the cardiovascular system and the metabolic requirements of the exercising muscle. The response differs both qualitatively and quantitatively according to the exercise intensity domain (moderate, heavy, very heavy and severe) in which it lies. In each domain, a rapid cardiodynamic phase 1 response is followed by an exponential rise in .VO2 toward a projected steady state (for which the inverse of the rate constant is represented as the time constant [tau]). The achievement of the new steady state may be delayed and elevated due to a slow component of .VO2 in the heavy intensity domain, or above this exercise intensity, the achievement of peak .VO2 truncates the exercise period. For each of these domains, specific mathematical models have been identified and may be applied to appropriate breath-by-breath response data in order to allow quantification of the response. Much of our understanding of the .VO2 kinetic response and the methodologies required to obtain meaningful assessment are derived from adult studies. Although pioneering, early studies with young people were lacking in suitable equipment and the methodologies used may consequently have clouded the true interpretation of the kinetic response. More recently, with the advent of online breath-by-breath analysis systems, studies using mathematical modelling procedures have been hindered by the low signal-to-noise ratio which is inherent to children's response profiles. This has the effect of widening the confidence intervals for estimated parameters, and therefore questions the validity in making inter- and intra-study comparisons. In addition, the difficulty in accurately assessing domain demarcators, especially critical power, often confounds the interpretation of age and sex effects on the exercise response.This review therefore analyses the literature to date on the .VO2 kinetic response during childhood and adolescence, and specifically highlights concerns with technical rigour in its determination. Rigorously determined data indicate that the exponential rise in .VO2 is more rapid in children than adults and that at exercise intensities above the anaerobic threshold, the slow component of .VO2 may be attenuated in the young. Sex differences have not been found in the response to moderate intensity exercise, and there does not appear to be a consistent correlation between peak .VO2 and tau in children. However, sex differences in the response to exercise intensities above the anaerobic threshold are identified and discussed.

Indexed as

ExerciseOxygen ConsumptionAdolescentAge FactorsChildFemaleHumansKineticsMaleSex Characteristics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.