Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12844359›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2003

Phylogenetically and spatially conserved word pairs associated with gene-expression changes in yeasts.

Derek Y Chiang, Alan M Moses, Manolis Kellis, Eric S Lander, Michael B Eisen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Disparate Dynamics of Gene Body andPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Importance sampling of word patterns in DNA and protein sequences.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2010
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Statistical methods for identifying yeast cell cycle transcription factors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2005
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Derek Y ChiangDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Alan M Moses
Manolis Kellis
Eric S Lander
Michael B Eisen
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research · USInstitut thématique Génétique, génomique et bioinformatique · FRUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of California System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscriptional regulation in eukaryotes often involves multiple transcription factors binding to the same transcription control region, and to understand the regulatory content of eukaryotic genomes it is necessary to consider the co-occurrence and spatial relationships of individual binding sites. The determination of conserved sequences (often known as phylogenetic footprinting) has identified individual transcription factor binding sites. We extend this concept of functional conservation to higher-order features of transcription control regions.

resultsWe used the genome sequences of four yeast species of the genus Saccharomyces to identify sequences potentially involved in multifactorial control of gene expression. We found 989 potential regulatory 'templates': pairs of hexameric sequences that are jointly conserved in transcription regulatory regions and also exhibit non-random relative spacing. Many of the individual sequences in these templates correspond to known transcription factor binding sites, and the sets of genes containing a particular template in their transcription control regions tend to be differentially expressed in conditions where the corresponding transcription factors are known to be active. The incorporation of word pairs to define sequence features yields more specific predictions of average expression profiles and more informative regression models for genome-wide expression data than considering sequence conservation alone.

conclusionsThe incorporation of both joint conservation and spacing constraints of sequence pairs predicts groups of target genes that are specific for common patterns of gene expression. Our work suggests that positional information, especially the relative spacing between transcription factor binding sites, may represent a common organizing principle of transcription control regions.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidBase SequenceBinding SitesConserved SequencePhylogenySaccharomycesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSequence Analysis, DNATranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID12844359
PMCPMC193630
OpenAlexW2143246780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.