ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2003
Candida dubliniensis infections in a pediatric population: retrospective identification from clinical laboratory isolates of Candida albicans.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methods of Candida dubliniensis identification and its occurrence in human clinical material.Folia microbiologica · 2017Article
- Candida dubliniensis: an appraisal of its clinical significance as a bloodstream pathogen.PloS one · 2012Article
- The first documented case of Candida dubliniensis leptomeningeal disease in an immunocompetent host.BMJ case reports · 2011Article
- Candida dubliniensis: epidemiology and phenotypic methods for identification.Mycopathologia · 2010Review
- The first clinical isolates of Candida dubliniensis in Slovakia.Mycopathologia · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Candida dubliniensis is a recently described species that shares many phenotypic and morphological features with Candida albicans. The clinical significance of isolating C. dubliniensis from the pediatric population is not clear, as most clinical isolates have been recovered from the oral cavities or bloodstreams of adults infected with human immunodeficiency virus. In order to understand further the epidemiology of C. dubliniensis in our pediatric population, we identified C. dubliniensis isolates from clinical isolates previously identified in the laboratory as C. albicans and conducted a retrospective chart review of cases of C. dubliniensis infections. A total of 205 isolates from 183 patients were tested, and only 14 (6.8%) were identified as C. dubliniensis. In 5 of the 14 positive cultures, C. dubliniensis was the sole organism isolated (two respiratory tract specimens, one tongue specimen, one vaginal specimen, and one skin specimen). A case review showed that there were no adverse outcomes for any of the patients, and only one of the patients with cultures positive for C. dubliniensis was immunocompromised. In our pediatric population, the distinction of C. dubliniensis from C. albicans did not prove to have significant clinical relevance. Data from further investigations may help to define better the role of C. dubliniensis as a potential pathogen in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.