Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12843030›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2003

Evaluation of culture methods and a DNA probe-based PCR assay for detection of Campylobacter species in clinical specimens of feces.

Majella Maher, Cathriona Finnegan, Evelyn Collins, Brid Ward, Cyril Carroll, Martin Cormican

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Editorial:Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Intra-abdominal infection withAccess microbiology · 2021
    Article
  4. International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  5. Isolation of emerging Campylobacter species in working farm dogs and their frozen home-killed raw meat diets.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2019
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Global Epidemiology of Campylobacter Infection.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2015
    Review
  8. Article
  9. The role of environmental reservoirs in human campylobacteriosis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2013
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Campylobacter concisus - A new player in intestinal disease.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2012
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Defining the causes of diarrhea: novel approaches.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2011
    Article
  17. Comparative analysis of cultural isolation and PCR based assay for detection of campylobacter jejuni in food and faecal samples.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2011
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Majella MaherThe National Diagnostics Centre, BioResearch, National University of Ireland and Department of Medical Microbiology, University College Hospital, Galway, Ireland. Majella.Maher@nuigalway.ie
Cathriona Finnegan
Evelyn Collins
Brid Ward
Cyril Carroll
Martin Cormican

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Campylobacter species are the leading agents of bacterial gastroenteritis in developed countries. In this study 320 specimens of feces from patients with symptoms of acute gastroenteritis were cultured for Campylobacter species by direct plating on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar and by enrichment in modified Preston broth, with or without blood added, for 48 h at 37 degrees C prior to plating. A 16S/23S PCR/DNA probe membrane-based colorimetric detection assay was evaluated on a subset of the feces (n = 127), including 18 culture-positive and 109 culture-negative specimens. DNA was extracted directly from the fecal specimens by using the QIAamp DNA stool Minikit for the DNA probe-based PCR assay (PCR/DNA probe assay). A second PCR/DNA probe assay based on the 16S rRNA gene in Campylobacter spp. was applied to all specimens that were culture negative, PCR/DNA positive on initial analysis. Campylobacter species were cultured in 20 of the 320 specimens. The 16S/23S PCR/DNA probe assay detected campylobacter DNA in 17 of 18 (94% sensitivity) culture-positive specimens and in 41 (38%) culture-negative specimens. The presence of campylobacter DNA in 35 of 41 culture-negative specimens was confirmed by the 16S PCR/DNA probe assay. DNA sequence analysis of seven 16S/23S PCR products and five 16S PCR products amplified from a selection of these specimens confirmed the presence of campylobacter DNA and more specifically Campylobacter jejuni, C. concisus, C. curvus, and C. gracilis DNA in these specimens. The molecular assays described in this study are rapid methods for the detection and identification of Campylobacter species in fecal specimens. The finding of Campylobacter spp. DNA in a large number of specimens of feces from patients with no other identified cause of diarrhea may suggest that Campylobacter spp. other than C. jejuni and C. coli may account for a proportion of cases of acute gastroenteritis in which no etiological agent is currently identified.

Indexed as

CampylobacterCampylobacter InfectionsColorimetryCulture MediaDNA, BacterialDNA ProbesFecesGastroenteritisHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 23SSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificityCulture MediaDNA, BacterialDNA ProbesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 23S

Identifiers

PMID12843030
PMCPMC165355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.