Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12843010›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2003

Comparison of diagnostic techniques for Helicobacter cetorum infection in wild Atlantic bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus).

Claudia G Harper, Mark T Whary, Yan Feng, Howard L Rhinehart, Randall S Wells, Shilu Xu, Nancy S Taylor, James G Fox

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Differentiation of GastricPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia G HarperDivision of Comparative Medicine, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Mark T Whary
Yan Feng
Howard L Rhinehart
Randall S Wells
Shilu Xu
Nancy S Taylor
James G Fox
Chicago Zoological Society · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USMote Marine Laboratory · US

Funding

POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING IN COMPARATIVE MEDICINET32RR007036 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI FOX, JAMES G · 1988 to 2011
$3.6M
IN VIVO PATHOGENESIS OF HELICOBACTER PYLORIR01AI037750 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI FOX, JAMES G · 1996 to 2009
$3.5M
NCRR NIH HHS T32 RR007036NCRR NIH HHS T32-RR07036NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI037750NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI37750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Helicobacter cetorum sp. nov. has been cultured from the stomach of Atlantic white-sided dolphins (Lagenorhynchus acutus) and the feces of Pacific white-sided (L. obliquidens) and Atlantic bottlenose (Tursiops truncatus) dolphins and a beluga whale (Delphinapterus leucas). H. cetorum has high homology to Helicobacter pylori as shown by 16S rRNA sequencing, and H. cetorum infection has been associated with gastritis and clinical signs in cetaceans. Because the prevalence of H. cetorum in wild populations is unknown, minimally invasive techniques for detecting H. cetorum were compared for 20 wild bottlenose dolphins sampled as part of a long-term health study. Fecal samples were tested for helicobacter by culture, Southern blotting, and PCR using genus-specific and H. cetorum-specific primers. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed to measure H. cetorum immunoglobulin G (IgG). H. cetorum was cultured from 4 of 20 fecal samples, 7 samples were positive using Helicobacter sp. PCR, and 8 samples were positive for H. cetorum using species-specific primers. Two additional fecal samples were positive by Helicobacter sp. Southern blotting, suggesting infection with another helicobacter. All 20 sera contained high levels of IgG antibodies to H. cetorum that were significantly lowered by preabsorption of the sera with whole-cell suspensions of H. cetorum (P < 0.02). Until the specificity of the serum ELISA can be determined by testing sera from dolphins confirmed to be uninfected, PCR and Southern blot screenings of feces are the most sensitive techniques for detection of H. cetorum, and results indicate there is at least a 50% prevalence of H. cetorum infection in these dolphins.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, WildAntibodies, BacterialBlotting, SouthernCulture MediaDNA PrimersDolphinsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFecesHelicobacterHelicobacter InfectionsPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySpecies SpecificityAntibodies, BacterialCulture MediaDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID12843010
PMCPMC165289
OpenAlexW2114272239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.