SynthesisAtencion primaria2003
[Effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care].
Synthesis in Atencion primaria, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo review and update evidence on the effectiveness of the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) of the elderly in the community environment.
designSystematic review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (January 1997 to November 2001) and The Cochrane Library, completed with a manual search. SELECTION OF STUDIES: Randomised clinical trials (RCT) to study the effects of a CGA in people over 64 and not in an institution. Trials that assessed mortality, institutionalisation and functional status were included. Those conducted after hospital discharge or not in a community environment were excluded. 133 summaries were reviewed and 16 articles analysed. DATA EXTRACTION: Methodological quality assessed with adapted Jadad scale. A data archive was worked out to collect information on characteristics of the population and the intervention and on the main findings.
resultsThe quality of the trials was adequate, though they had important methodological differences. Eleven trials found no favourable effects in the result variables studied. Five of the twelve trials which assessed functional status and one of the twelve that evaluated admissions to institutions found some favourable effect. None of the nine studies with mortality data found favourable results.
conclusionsEvidence for the effectiveness of the CGA for the elderly not in institutions continues to be inconsistent and insufficient. Nevertheless, given the complexity of this intervention, it seems prudent to continue to conduct CGAs of the elderly in the PC environment until such time as further studies clarify the role of these programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.