ReviewMolecular and cellular biochemistry2003
Dissemination of Chlamydia pneumoniae to the vessel wall in atherosclerosis.
Review in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genital Chlamydia infection in hyperlipidemic mouse models exacerbates atherosclerosis.Atherosclerosis · 2019Article
- Chlamydophila pneumoniae infection leads to smooth muscle cell proliferation and thickening in the coronary artery without contributions from a host immune response.The American journal of pathology · 2010Article
- Chlamydia pneumoniae, heat shock proteins 60 and risk of secondary cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease under special consideration of diabetes: a prospective study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart disease and stroke are the result of atherosclerotic vascular lesions. It is becoming increasingly clear that an infection may be an important initiating component within the atherogenic process. However, in order for the infection to contribute to atherosclerosis, it must first be capable of disseminating to the vessel wall. Chlamydia pneumoniae is an example of an infectious atherogenic stimulus. The present treatise reviews our knowledge concerning dissemination of infectious agents like C. pneumoniae. Three factors can be identified that modulate the severity of the infection in the vascular wall. First, although all vascular cell types appear to be infected with agents like C. pneumoniae, there are differences in the sensitivity to infection amongst these cell types. Second, the lipid environment is important in defining the effects of C. pneumoniae on atherosclerotic disease. Third, the inflammatory/atherosclerotic interaction is influenced by the specific infectious stimuli employed. The in situ atherogenic effects of C. pneumoniae may be specific to this organism and may not occur with related infectious agents like C. trachomatis. Despite the identification of these three factors, controversy exists surrounding specific characteristics of these effects. This may be the result of a plethora of differing experimental conditions (different labs, different lipids, different cell types or lines, and different C. pneumoniae characteristics (infection, dosage, duration, etc.)). Further study of these important phenomena is clearly warranted in view of the potential importance of infection to the atherosclerotic disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12841348W1549695086What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.