Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12838426›Full record

ArticleHistochemistry and cell biology2003

Expression of cathepsin H in differentiating rat spermatids: immunoelectron microscopic study.

Celina M Haraguchi, Kazuki Ishido, Eiki Kominami, Sadaki Yokota

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Ubiquitin signals in the developing acrosome during spermatogenesis of rat testis: an immunoelectron microscopic study.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2004
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Celina M HaraguchiCell Biology Laboratory, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine and Engineering, University of Yamanashi, Tamaho-cho, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan.
Kazuki Ishido
Eiki Kominami
Sadaki Yokota
Juntendo University · JPUniversity of Yamanashi · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The expression of cathepsin H (CH) in differentiating rat spermatids was studied by an immunoelectron microscopic technique. Cathepsin H was detected in the acrosome throughout differentiation steps but cathepsins B, D, and L and lysosomal membrane protein (LGP107) were not. Early in the formation of the acrosome, CH signals were observed in Golgi vesicles but not in acrosomal vesicles. At steps 3-4, CH signals were associated with a fibrous material attached to the inner surface of the vesicle membrane on the Golgi side. At steps 5-6, this fibrous material accumulated to form an electron-dense sheet to which CH signals were confined. The rest of the acrosome was negative for the enzyme. At steps 11-12, the CH-positive fibrous sheet expanded from the apical to the ventral side of the sperm head. After step 16, the surface of outer dense fibers in the flagellar axoneme and reticulated bodies were stained for CH. In epididymal sperm, CH signals were detected in the acrosome as well as on the surface of the outer dense fibers running from the middle to the principal piece. By immunofluorescence staining, CH was found to be localized to the acrosome, middle piece, and principal piece.

Indexed as

AcrosomeAnimalsBlotting, WesternCathepsin HCathepsinsCell DifferentiationCysteine EndopeptidasesFluorescent Antibody TechniqueMaleMicroscopy, ImmunoelectronRatsRats, WistarSpermatidsSperm TailCathepsin HCathepsinsCtsh protein, ratCysteine Endopeptidases

Identifiers

PMID12838426
OpenAlexW2063406876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.