Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12838282›Full record

Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2003

Methotrexate vs Cyclosporin A as a single agent for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in pediatric patients with hematological malignancies undergoing allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from HLA-identical siblings: a single-center analysis in Japan.

Y Koga, Y Nagatoshi, Y Kawano, J Okamura

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Y KogaSection of Pediatrics, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Y Nagatoshi
Y Kawano
J Okamura
National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) as a single graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis agent was compared to that of cyclosporin A (CSA) in 62 pediatric patients (median age: 8 years) with hematological malignancies who had undergone bone marrow transplantation (BMT) from HLA-identical sibling donors at National Kyushu Cancer Center since 1977. In all, 30 patients received MTX by intravenous bolus injection, with a dose of 15 mg/m(2) on day +1, followed by 10 mg/m(2) on days +3, +6, and +11, and then once a week until day +100. A total of 32 patients were treated with CSA, which was given intravenously in the early stages and orally thereafter until day +100, and then gradually tapered and stopped 6 months after BMT. There were no differences between the groups in terms of rates of hematopoietic recovery after BMT. The probabilities of acute GVHD (grades II-IV) and chronic GVHD were 29.6 vs 40.6% (P=0.294) and 19 vs 20% (MTX vs CSA), respectively. Relapse rates and event-free survival were identical. These results suggest that MTX and CSA were equally effective when given after BMT in Japanese pediatric patients with hematological malignancies. Since MTX was given over a shorter time than CSA, it might be more practical in the management of such patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentBone Marrow TransplantationChildChild, PreschoolCyclosporineFemaleGraft SurvivalGraft vs Host DiseaseHematologic NeoplasmsHistocompatibility TestingHumansInfantJapanMaleMethotrexateSiblingsCyclosporineMethotrexate

Identifiers

PMID12838282
OpenAlexW2046724741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.