Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12836697›Full record

ReviewJournal of structural and functional genomics2003

The fates of zebrafish Hox gene duplicates.

Chris Jozefowicz, James McClintock, Victoria Prince

Abstract readReview
PubMed
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of structural and functional genomics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A GATA factor radiation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Open life sciences · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Tandemly arrayed genes in vertebrate genomes.Comparative and functional genomics · 2008
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chris JozefowiczThe Committees on Evolutionary Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
James McClintock
Victoria Prince
University of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In his 1970 book, Susumu Ohno stressed the importance of gene duplication in the evolution of the vertebrate genome and body plan. He elaborated the idea that duplication events provide novel genetic material on which evolution may act. Data are accumulating to show that extensive duplication events, perhaps incorporating the duplication of entire genomes, occurred in the lineage leading to teleost fishes. These duplications may have been pivotal in the explosive radiation of this highly successful vertebrate group. Thus, the teleosts provide us with an ideal opportunity to investigate the fates and functions of duplicated genes. A convenient system for these studies is the zebrafish, Danio rerio, which has become a popular genetic and embryological model.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene DuplicationGenes, HomeoboxAnimalsChordata, NonvertebrateMultigene FamilyPhylogenyZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID12836697
OpenAlexW1849633811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.