Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12836685›Full record

ReviewJournal of structural and functional genomics2003

Numerous groups of chromosomal regional paralogies strongly indicate two genome doublings at the root of the vertebrates.

Lars-Gustav Lundin, Dan Larhammar, Finn Hallböök

Abstract readReview
PubMed
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of structural and functional genomics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Clustering of mammalian Hox genes with other H3K27me3 targets within an active nuclear domain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Evolution of developmental regulation in the vertebrate FgfD subfamily.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2010
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Evolution of vertebrate rod and cone phototransduction genes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2009
    Review
  19. Article
  20. The evolution of vertebrate opioid receptors.Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition) · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lars-Gustav LundinDepartment of Neuroscience, BMC, Uppsala University, S-751 24 Uppsala, Sweden. lglundin@neuro.uu.se
Dan Larhammar
Finn Hallböök

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The appearance of the vertebrates demarcates some of the most far-reaching changes of structure and function seen during the evolution of the metazoans. These drastic changes of body plan and expansion of the central nervous system among other organs coincide with increased gene numbers. The presence of several groups of paralogous chromosomal regions in the human genome is a reflection of this increase. The simplest explanation for the existence of these paralogies would be two genome doublings with subsequent silencing of many genes. It is argued that gene localization data and the delineation of paralogous chromosomal regions give more reliable information about these types of events than dendrograms of gene families as gene relationships are often obscured by uneven replacement rates as well as other factors. Furthermore, the topographical relations of some paralogy groups are discussed.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenomeSyntenyAnimalsChromosome InversionChromosome MappingGene DuplicationGene SilencingPhylogenyTranslocation, GeneticVertebrates

Identifiers

PMID12836685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.