ReviewJournal of structural and functional genomics2003
Gene duplication and other evolutionary strategies: from the RNA world to the future.
Review in Journal of structural and functional genomics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic exploration of retrocopies in Insect pests of plants and their role in the expansion of heat shock proteins superfamily as evolutionary targets.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Emergence of linkage between cooperative RNA replicators encoding replication and metabolic enzymes through experimental evolution.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Article
- Evolution of linkage and genome expansion in protocells: The origin of chromosomes.PLoS genetics · 2020Article
- Evolution of Melanoma Antigen-A11 (MAGEA11) During Primate Phylogeny.Journal of molecular evolution · 2018Article
- The persistent contributions of RNA to eukaryotic gen(om)e architecture and cellular function.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2014Review
- Interaction-based evolution: how natural selection and nonrandom mutation work together.Biology direct · 2013Article
- Does the central dogma still stand?Biology direct · 2012Article
- A whole genome screen for HIV restriction factors.Retrovirology · 2011Article
- The scenario on the origin of translation in the RNA world: in principle of replication parsimony.Biology direct · 2010Article
- Is evolution Darwinian or/and Lamarckian?Biology direct · 2009Article
- Novel long non-protein coding RNAs involved in Arabidopsis differentiation and stress responses.Genome research · 2009Article
- Biased exonization of transposed elements in duplicated genes: A lesson from the TIF-IA gene.BMC molecular biology · 2007Article
- On the origin of genomes and cells within inorganic compartments.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2005Article
- Aldolases a and C are ribonucleolytic components of a neuronal complex that regulates the stability of the light-neurofilament mRNA.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Beginning with a hypothetical RNA world, it is apparent that many evolutionary transitions led to the complexity of extant species. The duplication of genetic material is rooted in the RNA world. One of two major routes of gene amplification, retroposition, originated from mechanisms that facilitated the transition to DNA as hereditary material. Even in modern genomes the process of retroposition leads to genetic novelties including the duplication of protein and RNA coding genes, as well as regulatory elements and their juxtapositon. We examine whether and to what extent known evolutionary principles can be applied to an RNA-based world. We conclude that the major basic Neo-Darwinian principles that include amplification, variation and selection already governed evolution in the RNA and RNP worlds. In this hypothetical RNA world there were few restrictions on the exchange of genetic material and principles that acted as borders at later stages, such as Weismann's Barrier, the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology, or the Darwinian Threshold were absent or rudimentary. RNA was more than a gene: it had a dual role harboring, genotypic and phenotypic capabilities, often in the same molecule. Nuons, any discrete nucleic acid sequences, were selected on an individual basis as well as in groups. The performance and success of an individual nuon was markedly dependent on the type of other nuons in a given cell. In the RNA world the transition may already have begun towards the linkage of nuons to yield a composite linear RNA genome, an arrangement necessitating the origin of RNA processing. A concatenated genome may have curbed unlimited exchange of genetic material; concomitantly, selfish nuons were more difficult to purge. A linked genome may also have constituted the beginning of the phenotype/genotype separation. This division of tasks was expanded when templated protein biosynthesis led to the RNP world, and more so when DNA took over as genetic material. The aforementioned barriers and thresholds increased and the significance and extent of horizontal gene transfer fluctuated over major evolutionary transitions. At the dawn of the most recent transformation, a fast evolutionary transition that we will be witnessing in our life times, a form of Lamarckism is raising its head.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.