Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1283579›Full record

ReviewDrugs1992

Choosing the correct drug for the individual hypertensive patient.

L H Opie

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

L H OpieIschaemic Heart Disease Research Unit, Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
University of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the availability of a wide selection of antihypertensive drugs acting by different mechanisms, it should be possible to match the requirement of individual patients with the pharmacological and clinical properties of an appropriate agent. Although the concept of stepped-care therapy is now largely outdated, therapy must be initiated with one agent. Diuretics remain a first-choice option in the elderly and in Black patients, as do calcium antagonists. In patients with ischaemic heart disease or enhanced adrenergic drive, beta-blockers are preferred. Calcium antagonists or ACE inhibitors are finding increasing use as initial therapy when quality of life is important and metabolic neutrality is required. The choice of antihypertensive agent may be limited by adverse effects, e.g. pedal oedema with nifedipine, constipation with verapamil, and cough with ACE inhibitors. Certain advantages are evident for both calcium antagonists and ACE inhibitors. Calcium antagonists are more likely to be effective first-line therapy than ACE inhibitors in Black patients, in those with a high salt intake, in patients with Raynaud's disease, and when angina pectoris is present. ACE inhibitors are preferred for use in combination with diuretic agents, and in the presence of congestive heart failure or low salt intake. Combination therapy between these 2 drug classes is finding increasing acceptance because of its many theoretical advantages, and may provide a means of maximising benefit.

Indexed as

HumansHypertension

Identifiers

PMID1283579
OpenAlexW2038121109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.