Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12834268›Full record

ReviewNeurochemical research2003

Enhancer regulation/endogenous and synthetic enhancer compounds: a neurochemical concept of the innate and acquired drives.

Joseph Knoll

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurochemical research, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Joseph KnollDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of General Medicine, Semmelweis University, POB 370, H-1445 Budapest, Hungary. jozsefknoll@hotmail.com

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review is to summarize experimental evidence and theoretical consideration in support of the concept that a mesencephalic enhancer regulation is the basis of the limited number of innate drives indispensable for the survival of the individual and the species, while a specifically organized telencephalic enhancer regulation is the basis of the acquired drives to reach an unlimited number of dispensable goals. The study is also an overview of the experimental and clinical data supporting the proposal that, due to the progressive decay of the mesencephalic enhancer regulation with the passing of time, the prophylactic administration of a synthetic enhancer substance [(-)-deprenyl, (-)-BPAP] during postdevelopmental life could significantly slow the age-related decay of behavioral performances, prolong life, and prevent the precipitation or delay the onset of Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease.

Indexed as

Nootropic AgentsSelegilineNootropic AgentsSelegiline

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.