Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12833131›Full record

ArticleCancer gene therapy2003

Safety of intravenous administration of a canarypox virus encoding the human wild-type p53 gene in colorectal cancer patients.

Anand G Menon, Peter J K Kuppen, Sjoerd H van der Burg, Rienk Offringa, Marie Claude Bonnet, Bert I J Harinck, Rob A E M Tollenaar, Anke Redeker, Hein Putter, Philippe Moingeon and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer gene therapy, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Clinical and Immunological Effects of p53-Targeting Vaccines.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anand G MenonDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Peter J K Kuppen
Sjoerd H van der Burg
Rienk Offringa
Marie Claude Bonnet
Bert I J Harinck
Rob A E M Tollenaar
Anke Redeker
Hein Putter
Philippe Moingeon
Hans Morreau
Cornelis J M Melief
Cornelis J H van de Velde
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overexpression of p53 occurs in more than 50% of colorectal cancers. Therefore, p53 represents an attractive target antigen for immunotherapy. We assessed the safety of a canarypox virus encoding the human wild-type p53 gene given intravenously to end-stage colorectal cancer patients in a three-step dose escalation study aimed at inducing p53 immune responses. Patients with metastatic disease of p53-overexpressing colorectal cancers were vaccinated three times at 3-week intervals, each time with 10(6.5) CCID(50) (CCID(50)=cell culture infectious dose 50%; group 1, n=5), 10(7.0) CCID(50) (group 2, n=5) or 10(7.5) CCID(50) (group 3, n=6). Vital signs and the occurrence of adverse events were monitored and blood was analyzed for biochemical and hematological parameters as well as signs of auto-immune safety. In all, 16 patients were enrolled and 15 patients completed three vaccinations. No anaphylactic reaction or unwanted auto-immune reactions were observed. A total of 16 serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred: 10 in group 1, three in group 2 and three in group 3. All SAEs were tumor-related complications. There was no difference in the frequency of adverse events between the three groups, except for fever. Fever was the only vaccination-related adverse event consistently observed and was most frequent and outspoken in the group 3 patients. The majority was a grade 1 or 2 fever (93%) and grade 3 fever (7%) was observed in three patients of group 3. Some patients showed humoral and cellular responses against p53, following vaccinations. After having completed his initial treatment cycle, one patient (group 2) received a second treatment cycle of three doses of 10(7.5) CCID(50) and subsequently showed stable disease. All other patients showed progressive disease. We conclude that ALVAC-p53 can be administered intravenously to colorectal cancer patients without serious toxicity or pathological autoimmunity and can induce immune responses against p53.

Indexed as

Canarypox virusGenes, p53Genetic VectorsAdultAgedColonic NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGenetic TherapyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingPatient SelectionRectal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID12833131
OpenAlexW2002861481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.