Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12832616›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2003

Dynamic, yet structured: The cell membrane three decades after the Singer-Nicolson model.

G Vereb, J Szöllosi, J Matkó, P Nagy, T Farkas, L Vigh, L Mátyus, T A Waldmann, S Damjanovich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 126 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Elucidation of Ganglioside Microdomains Using Proximity Labeling.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genomic insights into an endophyticFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

G VerebDepartment of Biophysics and Cell Biology, Research Center for Molecular Medicine, Medical and Health Science Center, University of Debrecen, H-4012, Debrecen, Hungary.
J Szöllosi
J Matkó
P Nagy
T Farkas
L Vigh
L Mátyus
T A Waldmann
S Damjanovich

Funding

IL-2:IL-15 : implications for cancer therapy (Investigator -Initiated Project)ZIASC004002 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI WALDMANN, THOMAS · 2009 to 2022
$22.9M
Immunoregulatory Cell Receptor Defects--Leukemia/LymphomZ01SC004002 · SC · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI WALDMANN, THOMAS A · 1996 to 2008
$6.1M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fluid mosaic membrane model proved to be a very useful hypothesis in explaining many, but certainly not all, phenomena taking place in biological membranes. New experimental data show that the compartmentalization of membrane components can be as important for effective signal transduction as is the fluidity of the membrane. In this work, we pay tribute to the Singer-Nicolson model, which is near its 30th anniversary, honoring its basic features, "mosaicism" and "diffusion," which predict the interspersion of proteins and lipids and their ability to undergo dynamic rearrangement via Brownian motion. At the same time, modifications based on quantitative data are proposed, highlighting the often genetically predestined, yet flexible, multilevel structure implementing a vast complexity of cellular functions. This new "dynamically structured mosaic model" bears the following characteristics: emphasis is shifted from fluidity to mosaicism, which, in our interpretation, means nonrandom codistribution patterns of specific kinds of membrane proteins forming small-scale clusters at the molecular level and large-scale clusters (groups of clusters, islands) at the submicrometer level. The cohesive forces, which maintain these assemblies as principal elements of the membranes, originate from within a microdomain structure, where lipid-lipid, protein-protein, and protein-lipid interactions, as well as sub- and supramembrane (cytoskeletal, extracellular matrix, other cell) effectors, many of them genetically predestined, play equally important roles. The concept of fluidity in the original model now is interpreted as permissiveness of the architecture to continuous, dynamic restructuring of the molecular- and higher-level clusters according to the needs of the cell and as evoked by the environment.

Indexed as

Membrane FluidityModels, BiologicalAnimalsCell MembraneChemical PhenomenaChemistry, PhysicalDiffusionFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferLipid BilayersMembrane LipidsMembrane MicrodomainsMembrane ProteinsMicroscopy, ElectronSignal TransductionLipid BilayersMembrane LipidsMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID12832616
PMCPMC166180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.