ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2003
Effects of inbreeding on the genetic diversity of populations.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 154 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
154 citing papers in PubMed, 473 citations in OpenAlex.
- What has population genomics told us about the dynamics of selection and plant adaptation?Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Review
- Homothallic or Heterothallic? A Genomic Investigation Into the Sexual Capabilities of the Ascomycete Fungus Clonostachys rosea.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Population Genetic Structure ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Speciation, endangerment and adaptation in limestone rocky environment ofPlant diversity · 2026Article
- Patterns of Interploidy Admixture in Polyploid Complexes: Insights From Thymus Sect. Mastichina (Lamiaceae).Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Article
- The genetic architecture of quantitative variation in the self-incompatibility response within Phlox drummondii (Polemoniaceae).Genetics · 2025Article
- A Conceptual Disease Cycle Model to Link the Size of Past and Future Epidemics.Ecology and evolution · 2025Review
- Distribution of runs of homozygosity in Lactuca species and its implications for plant breeding and evolutionary conservation.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Improving genomic selection in hexaploid wheat with sub-genome additive and epistatic models.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Independent origins and non-parallel selection signatures of triclabendazole resistance in Fasciola hepatica.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The genomic consequences and persistence of sociality in spiders.Genome research · 2025Article
- Hill-Robertson interference may bias the inference of fitness effects of new mutations in highly selfing species.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2025Article
- The Role of Reproductive Modes in Shaping Genetic Diversity in Polyploids: A Comparative Study of Selfing, Outcrossing, and ApomicticPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Low Genetic Diversity and Complex Population Structure in Black Piranha (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Population genomics and connectivity of Vazella pourtalesii sponge grounds of the northwest Atlantic with conservation implications of deep sea vulnerable marine ecosystems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Rapid detection of RNase-based self-incompatibility in Lysimachia monelli (Primulaceae).American journal of botany · 2025Article
- Genome-Wide Development and Characterization of Microsatellite Markers in the Great Web-Spinning SawflyEcology and evolution · 2024Article
- Does a coexisting congener of a mixed mating species affect the genetic structure and selfing rate via reproductive interference?Oecologia · 2024Article
- Hill-Robertson interference may bias the inference of fitness effects of new mutations in highly selfing species.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
94 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study of variability within species is important to all biologists who use genetic markers. Since the discovery of molecular variability among normal individuals, data have been collected from a wide range of organisms, and it is important to understand the major factors affecting diversity levels and patterns. Comparisons of inbreeding and outcrossing populations can contribute to this understanding, and therefore studying plant populations is important, because related species often have different breeding systems. DNA sequence data are now starting to become available from suitable plant and animal populations, to measure and compare variability levels and test predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.