ArticleBiophysical journal2003
Proton transfer reactions in native and deionized bacteriorhodopsin upon delipidation and monomerization.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Roles of functional lipids in bacteriorhodopsin photocycle in various delipidated purple membranes.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
- Highly Efficient Transfer of 7TM Membrane Protein from Native Membrane to Covalently Circularized Nanodisc.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Tuning the Photocycle Kinetics of Bacteriorhodopsin in Lipid Nanodiscs.Biophysical journal · 2015Article
- The protonation-deprotonation kinetics of the protonated Schiff base in bicelle bacteriorhodopsin crystals.Biophysical journal · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have investigated the role of the native lipids on bacteriorhodopsin (bR) proton transfer and their connection with the cation-binding role. We observe that both the efficiency of M formation and the kinetics of M rise and decay depend on the lipids and lattice but, as the lipids are removed, the cation binding is a much less important factor for the proton pumping function. Upon 75% delipidation using 3-[(cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-propanesulfonate (CHAPS), the M formation and decay kinetics are much slower than the native, and the efficiency of M formation is approximately 30%-40% that of the native. Upon monomerization of bR by Trition X-100, the efficiency of M recovers close to that of the native (depending on pH), M formation is approximately 10 times faster, and M decay kinetics are comparable to native at pH 7. The same results on the M intermediate are observed if deionized blue bR (deI bbR) is treated with these detergents (with or without pH buffers present), even though deionized blue bR containing all the lipids has no photocycle. This suggests that the cation(s) has a role in native bR that is different than in delipidated or monomerized bR, even so far as to suggest that the cation(s) becomes unimportant to the function as the lipids are removed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.