Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12829497›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2003

Proton transfer reactions in native and deionized bacteriorhodopsin upon delipidation and monomerization.

Colin D Heyes, Mostafa A El-Sayed

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Colin D HeyesLaser Dynamics Laboratory, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400, USA.
Mostafa A El-Sayed
Georgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have investigated the role of the native lipids on bacteriorhodopsin (bR) proton transfer and their connection with the cation-binding role. We observe that both the efficiency of M formation and the kinetics of M rise and decay depend on the lipids and lattice but, as the lipids are removed, the cation binding is a much less important factor for the proton pumping function. Upon 75% delipidation using 3-[(cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-propanesulfonate (CHAPS), the M formation and decay kinetics are much slower than the native, and the efficiency of M formation is approximately 30%-40% that of the native. Upon monomerization of bR by Trition X-100, the efficiency of M recovers close to that of the native (depending on pH), M formation is approximately 10 times faster, and M decay kinetics are comparable to native at pH 7. The same results on the M intermediate are observed if deionized blue bR (deI bbR) is treated with these detergents (with or without pH buffers present), even though deionized blue bR containing all the lipids has no photocycle. This suggests that the cation(s) has a role in native bR that is different than in delipidated or monomerized bR, even so far as to suggest that the cation(s) becomes unimportant to the function as the lipids are removed.

Indexed as

ProtonsAbsorptiometry, PhotonBacteriorhodopsinsBiological TransportIonsKineticsLipidsPhotochemistryProtein ConformationProton PumpsSpectrum AnalysisBacteriorhodopsinsIonsLipidsProton PumpsProtons

Identifiers

PMID12829497
PMCPMC1303098
OpenAlexW2038018734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.