Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1282865›Full record

ReviewDrugs1992

Interferons in multiple sclerosis. A review of the evidence.

H S Panitch

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Engineering cytokine therapeutics.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Th1 and Th17 cells: adversaries and collaborators.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2010
    Review
  10. Myelin under stress.Journal of neuroscience research · 2009
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Interferon gamma induces retrograde dendritic retraction and inhibits synapse formation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2002
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Immunotherapy for multiple sclerosis.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 1994
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

H S PanitchNeurology Service, VA Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Washington DC VA Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, characterised clinically by relapses and remissions, and leading eventually to chronic disability. Despite an enormous amount of research, the cause of MS remains unknown; however, pathological, genetic, and immunological features have been identified that suggest the disease has an autoimmune basis. Accordingly, current therapy of MS includes corticotrophin or corticosteroids for acute exacerbations, and more potent immunosuppressive drugs for severe cases unresponsive to steroids. All of these agents can cause serious adverse reactions. There is an urgent need for immunotherapy that is less toxic, that can be given early and perhaps indefinitely, and that will prevent relapses and progression of the disease. Our current knowledge of the effects of interferons (IFNs) in MS is based on the results of laboratory research and clinical therapeutic trials carried out over the past decade. Existing evidence points to the conclusion that the effects of the IFNs in MS are mediated by immunoregulatory rather than antiviral or nonspecific mechanisms. Administration of IFN gamma increases the exacerbation rate, and IFN gamma as well as other cytokines may be involved in the pathogenesis of MS lesions. In contrast, studies of IFN beta show that it tends to inhibit the activity of IFN gamma and appears to prevent disease activity. Intrathecal administration of IFN beta, although effective, is cumbersome and potentially hazardous. A large multicentre placebo-controlled trial of systemic recombinant IFN beta was recently conducted in the US, and the results of the first 2 years of treatment were considered sufficiently encouraging that an application for licensing was submitted to the Food and Drug Administration in June 1992. If approved, it will be the first new agent licensed for clinical use in MS in over 20 years. The study will continue under double-blind conditions for at least another year, and a second trial of systemic recombinant IFN beta therapy is also in progress. These studies should provide definitive answers to questions about the role of IFNs in the pathogenesis of MS, as well as the place of recombinant IFN beta as an effective therapeutic agent.

Indexed as

AdultClinical Trials as TopicHumansInterferon-betaInterferon-gammaInterferonsMultiple SclerosisRecombinant ProteinsInterferon-betaInterferon-gammaInterferonsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID1282865
OpenAlexW2124628509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.