ReviewDrug safety2003
'Atypical' antidepressants in overdose: clinical considerations with respect to safety.
Review in Drug safety, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacological Augmentation in Unipolar Depression: A Guide to the Guidelines.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2020Pooled it
- Therapeutic Implications of microRNAs in Depressive Disorders: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Intralipid administration in case of a severe venlafaxine overdose in a patient with previous gastric bypass surgery.Toxicology reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 'atypical' antidepressants comprise a heterogenous class with wide variation in presentation and management during overdose, both when compared with each other and with more traditional agents.Further toxico-epidemiological data are required to make definitive predictions about the clinical effects of most of these agents in overdose. Here, however, we review the available information in a manner intended to benefit both prescribers and clinical toxicologists. Our conclusion is that there can be no generic response by medical practitioners as to the 'safety' of these new antidepressants. Though undoubtedly exhibiting fewer problems in specific areas than some of the older classes of agents (e.g. arrhythmias with tricyclic antidepressants) each nonetheless presents unique safety problems. We experienced great difficulty obtaining accurate information from the manufacturers about the animal toxicity data upon which their recommended human dose limits were set. This highlights the uncertainties involved with too readily making 'safety' claims about these agents. The decision to prescribe 'atypical' antidepressant medications alleged to be both efficacious and safe in overdose involves a medicolegal tension. This tension is between respecting patient autonomy through frank communication of the material risk of overdose and non-disclosure to avoid such harm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.