ArticleJournal of human hypertension2003
Both body and arm position significantly influence blood pressure measurement.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 148 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-invasive myocardial work analysis in normal, at-risk for heart failure and heart failure patients during stress testing-a systematic review: a joint session with the Romanian Society of Cardiology (part III).Heart failure reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of amphetamines on blood pressure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of adrenergic agonist oral decongestants on blood pressure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring and management of adults having non-cardiac surgery: Guidelines of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine in collaboration with the German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2024Guideline
- Sources of inaccuracy in the measurement of adult patients' resting blood pressure in clinical settings: a systematic review.Journal of hypertension · 2017Pooled it
- Comparison of stethoscope bell and diaphragm, and of stethoscope tube length, for clinical blood pressure measurement.Blood pressure monitoring · 2016Trial
- Effect of supine versus sitting position on noninvasive assessment of aortic pressure waveform: a randomized cross-over study.Journal of human hypertension · 2014Trial
- Association of supine versus seated hypertension with cardiovascular events in older adults.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
- Supine hypertension and cardiovascular disease: controversies and advances.Future cardiology · 2025Review
- Clinical validation of a wearable ultrasound sensor of blood pressure.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Supine Blood Pressure and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality.JAMA cardiology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of the HUAWEI WATCH D for measuring spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during elective cesarean section: a diagnostic test.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Haemodynamic monitoring during noncardiac surgery: past, present, and future.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2024Review
- Defining systolic blood pressure normative values in hospitalized pediatric patients: a single center experience.Pediatric research · 2024Observational
- Quantification of neurovascular compliance with retrospectively gated phase-contrast MRI.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- A Survey on Blood Pressure Measurement Technologies: Addressing Potential Sources of Bias.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Review
- Wrist ballistocardiography and invasively recorded blood pressure in healthy volunteers during reclining bike exercise.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Variation of peripheral pulse transit time with internal vascular pressure changes induced by arm movement.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Effective Prevention and Management Tools for Metabolic Syndrome Based on Digital Health-Based Lifestyle Interventions Using Healthcare Devices.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The position of both the body and the arm during indirect blood pressure (BP) measurement is often neglected. The aim of the present study was to test the influence of the position of the patient on BP readings: (1) sitting with the arms supported precisely at the right atrium level and (2) supine: (a) with the arms precisely at the right atrium level and (b) with the arms on the examination bed. In a first group of 57 hypertensive patients, two sessions of BP and heart rate (HR) measurements were performed in two positions: sitting and supine with the arms supported precisely at right atrium level in both positions. BP was measured simultaneously at both arms, with a Hawksley Random Zero sphygmomanometer at the right arm, and with an automated oscillometric device (Bosomat) at the left arm. BP and HR readings obtained in the two positions were then compared. In a second group of 25 normo- and hypertensive persons, two sessions of BP and HR readings were performed in supine with the arms in two different arm positions: (a) the arm placed precisely at right atrium level and (b) the other arm on the examination bed. The measurements were performed at both arms with two automated devices (Bosomat). The readings taken in the two positions were compared. Both systolic BP (SBP; by 9.5 +/- 9.0 (standard deviation, s.d.); right arm) and diastolic BP (DBP; by 4.8 +/- 6.0 mmHg; right arm) were significantly higher in the supine than in the sitting position. When the two different arm positions (body continously supine) were compared in the second part of the study, significantly higher SBP (by 4.6 +/- 6.1 mmHg) and DBP (by 3.9 +/- 2.8 mmHg) were obtained when the arm of the patient was placed on the bed (below the right atrium level), than when the arm was placed at the level of the right atrium. BP readings in sitting and supine positions are not the same. When according to guidelines the arm of the patient is meticulously placed at the right atrium level in both positions, the difference is even greater than when the arm rests on the desk or on the arm support of the chair. Moreover, in the supine position small but significant differences in BP are measured between arm on a 5 cm-high pillow and arm on the bed. In every study reporting BP values, the position of both the body and especially the arm should be precisely mentioned.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.