Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12819125›Full record

ArticleGenome research2003

Targeting a complex transcriptome: the construction of the mouse full-length cDNA encyclopedia.

Piero Carninci, Kazunori Waki, Toshiyuki Shiraki, Hideaki Konno, Kazuhiro Shibata, Masayoshi Itoh, Katsunori Aizawa, Takahiro Arakawa, Yoshiyuki Ishii, Daisuke Sasaki and 37 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Paradigm shifts in genomics through the FANTOM projects.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

47 authors.

Piero CarninciLaboratory for Genome Exploration Research Group, RIKEN Genomic Sciences Center (GSC), RIKEN Yokohama Institute, Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.
Kazunori Waki
Toshiyuki Shiraki
Hideaki Konno
Kazuhiro Shibata
Masayoshi Itoh
Katsunori Aizawa
Takahiro Arakawa
Yoshiyuki Ishii
Daisuke Sasaki
Hidemasa Bono
Shinji Kondo
Yuichi Sugahara
Rintaro Saito
Naoki Osato
Shiro Fukuda
Kenjiro Sato
Akira Watahiki
Tomoko Hirozane-Kishikawa
Mari Nakamura
Yuko Shibata
Ayako Yasunishi
Noriko Kikuchi
Atsushi Yoshiki
Moriaki Kusakabe
Stefano Gustincich
Kirk Beisel
William Pavan
Vassilis Aidinis
Akira Nakagawara
William A Held
Hiroo Iwata
Tomohiro Kono
Hiromitsu Nakauchi
Paul Lyons
Christine Wells
David A Hume
Michela Fagiolini
Takao K Hensch
Michelle Brinkmeier
Sally Camper
Junji Hirota
Peter Mombaerts
Masami Muramatsu
Yasushi Okazaki
Jun Kawai
Yoshihide Hayashizaki

Funding

Function genomic analysis of neural crest developmentZIAHG000136 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI PAVAN, WILLIAM J · 2009 to 2023
$13.6M
ANALYSIS OF DOMINANT MEGACOLON--ANOTHER MODEL FORHIRSCHSPRUNG DISEASEZIAHG000070 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI PAVAN, WILLIAM J · 2009 to 2023
$13.4M
DOMINANT MEGACOLON--ANOTHER MODEL FOR HIRSCHSPRUNG DISZ01HG000070 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI PAVAN, WILLIAM J · 1996 to 2008
$2.3M
Function genomic analysis of neural crest developmentZ01HG000136 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI PAVAN, WILLIAM J · 1999 to 2008
$2.3M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the construction of the mouse full-length cDNA encyclopedia,the most extensive view of a complex transcriptome,on the basis of preparing and sequencing 246 libraries. Before cloning,cDNAs were enriched in full-length by Cap-Trapper,and in most cases,aggressively subtracted/normalized. We have produced 1,442,236 successful 3'-end sequences clustered into 171,144 groups, from which 60,770 clones were fully sequenced cDNAs annotated in the FANTOM-2 annotation. We have also produced 547,149 5' end reads,which clustered into 124,258 groups. Altogether, these cDNAs were further grouped in 70,000 transcriptional units (TU),which represent the best coverage of a transcriptome so far. By monitoring the extent of normalization/subtraction, we define the tentative equivalent coverage (TEC),which was estimated to be equivalent to >12,000,000 ESTs derived from standard libraries. High coverage explains discrepancies between the very large numbers of clusters (and TUs) of this project,which also include non-protein-coding RNAs,and the lower gene number estimation of genome annotations. Altogether,5'-end clusters identify regions that are potential promoters for 8637 known genes and 5'-end clusters suggest the presence of almost 63,000 transcriptional starting points. An estimate of the frequency of polyadenylation signals suggests that at least half of the singletons in the EST set represent real mRNAs. Clones accounting for about half of the predicted TUs await further sequencing. The continued high-discovery rate suggests that the task of transcriptome discovery is not yet complete.

Indexed as

Cloning, MolecularGenomeAnimalsCluster AnalysisDatabases, GeneticDNA, ComplementaryExpressed Sequence TagsGene Expression ProfilingGene LibraryGenesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOrgan SpecificityPolyadenylationRNA CapsSequence Analysis, DNADNA, ComplementaryRNA Caps

Identifiers

PMID12819125
PMCPMC403712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.