Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12817889›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2003

Prediction of in vivo tissue distribution from in vitro data. 3. Correlation between in vitro and in vivo tissue distribution of a homologous series of nine 5-n-alkyl-5-ethyl barbituric acids.

Peter Ballard, David E Leahy, Malcolm Rowland

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Drug structure-transport relationships.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2010
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter BallardDiscovery-DMPK, Mereside, AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Cheshire, SK10 4TG, United Kingdom. peter.ballard@astrazeneca.com
David E Leahy
Malcolm Rowland

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the ability to determine accurate in vivo tissue-to-unbound plasma distribution coefficients (Kpue) from in vitro data.

methodsFresh pieces of fifteen rat tissues/organs were incubated at 37 degrees C with a homologous series of nine barbiturates covering a wide range of lipophilicity (Log P 0.02 to 4.13). Steady-state in vivo Kpue values were estimated from the tissue and plasma concentrations following simultaneous dosing by constant rate i.v. infusion of all nine barbiturates. Drug concentrations in the tissues and media were determined by HPLC with UV or mass spectrometric detection.

resultsThe pharmacokinetics of the barbiturate series following constant rate i.v. infusion indicated a range of clearance (0.49 to 30 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1)) and volume of distribution at steady state (0.51 to 1.9 l x kg(-1)) values. Good agreement was observed between the in vitro and in vivo Kpu values, although for the most lipophilic barbiturates the in vitro data underpredicted the in vivo tissue distribution for all tissues.

conclusionThe in vitro system for predicting the extent of in vivo tissue distribution works well for compounds of widely differing lipophilicity, although for the most lipophilic drugs it may result in an underprediction of in vivo values.

Indexed as

AnimalsBarbituratesChemical PhenomenaChemistry, PhysicalChromatography, High Pressure LiquidHalf-LifeHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationIndicators and ReagentsInfusions, IntravenousMaleMass SpectrometryMolecular WeightRatsRats, WistarSpectrophotometry, UltravioletStructure-Activity RelationshipBarbituratesIndicators and Reagents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.