Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12816548›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2003

Feasibility study of multidisciplinary oncology rounds by videoconference for surgeons in remote locales.

Anna Gagliardi, Andy Smith, Vivek Goel, Denny DePetrillo

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Implementation of a regional virtual tumor board: a prospective study evaluating feasibility and provider acceptance.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2014
    Article
  9. Bridging the distance: a prospective tele-oncology study in Northern Norway.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Access to cancer services for rural colorectal cancer patients.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2008
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anna GagliardiCancer Care Ontario, 620 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2L7. anna.gagliardi@utoronto.ca
Andy Smith
Vivek Goel
Denny DePetrillo
Canada Research Chairs · CACancer Care Ontario · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study was undertaken to assess the feasibility of using videoconferencing to involve community-based surgeons in interactive, multidisciplinary oncology rounds so they may benefit from the type of community of practice that is usually only available in academic cancer centres.

methodsAn existing videoconference service provider with sites across Ontario was chosen and the series was accredited. Indirect needs assessment involved examining responses to a previously conducted survey of provincial surgeons; interviewing three cancer surgeons from different regions of Ontario; and by analyzing an online portfolio of self-directed learning projects. Direct needs assessment involved a survey of surgeons at videoconference-enabled sites. A surgical, medical and radiation oncologist plus a facilitator were scheduled to guide discussion for each session. A patient scenario developed by the discussants was distributed to participants one week prior to each session.

resultsDirect and indirect needs assessment confirmed that breast cancer and colorectal cancer topics were of greatest importance to community surgeons. Six one-hour sessions were offered (two breast, two colorectal, one gynecologic and one lung cancer). A median of 22 physicians and a median of eight sites participated in each session. The majority of respondents were satisfied with the videoconference format, presenters and content. Many noted that discussion prompted reflection on practice and that current practice would change.

conclusionsThis pilot study demonstrated that it is possible to engage remote surgeons in multidisciplinary oncology rounds by videoconference. Continued assessment of videoconferencing is warranted but further research is required to develop frameworks by which to evaluate the benefits of telehealth initiatives.

Indexed as

Interdisciplinary CommunicationSurgical Procedures, OperativeData CollectionDecision Support TechniquesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMedical InformaticsMedical OncologyNeeds AssessmentOntarioPatient Care PlanningPilot ProjectsRemote ConsultationTelecommunicationsVideotape Recording

Identifiers

PMID12816548
PMCPMC165596
OpenAlexW1557912485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.