Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12811421›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2003

The role of SPET and PET in monitoring tumour response to therapy.

Chariklia Giannopoulou

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Radiofrequency ablation of lung tumors: imaging features of the postablation zone.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Chariklia GiannopoulouNuclear Medicine Department, "Evangelismos" Hospital, 75-77 Ipsilandou Street, 106 76, Athens, Greece. harisg@otenet.gr

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission tomography (SPET) are cross-sectional, quantitative functional imaging modalities in routine use in oncology for the initial staging of cancer, the assessment of patients with recurrent or residual disease and, more recently, for monitoring tumour response to therapy. Both PET and SPET can track tumour biological and metabolic changes caused by therapy or by disease progression, which usually precede the anatomical alterations conventionally detected by anatomical imaging methods. These highly sensitive functional imaging modalities have been used for the early assessment of subclinical tumour response, the evaluation of therapy after its completion and the detection of viable recurrent or relapsing tumour. Timely assessment of response to treatment using PET and SPET may result in modifications in treatment planning and individualisation of therapy and may have prognostic value for the long-term outcome. This review attempts to summarise the current data available on the expanding role of SPET and PET, using a variety of tracers, in monitoring tumour response to therapy in a wide range of malignancies, with emphasis on their clinical impact.

Indexed as

RadiopharmaceuticalsAntineoplastic AgentsHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasmsPractice Patterns, Physicians'PrognosisRadiotherapyRisk AssessmentTomography, Emission-ComputedTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.