ReviewPharmacoEconomics2003
Assessing the economic impact of adverse drug effects.
Review in PharmacoEconomics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 174 citations in OpenAlex.
- Number of drugs most frequently found to be independent risk factors for serious adverse reactions: a systematic literature review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015Pooled it
- Comparative epidemiology of hospital-acquired adverse drug reactions in adults and children and their impact on cost and hospital stay--a systematic review.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2013Pooled it
- How are the costs of drug-related morbidity measured?: a systematic literature review.Drug safety · 2012Pooled it
- Percentage of patients with preventable adverse drug reactions and preventability of adverse drug reactions--a meta-analysis.PloS one · 2012Pooled it
- Changing mindsets about methotrexate in the rheumatology clinic to reduce side effects and improve adherence: a randomized controlled trial.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2025Trial
- Impact of early in-hospital medication review by clinical pharmacists on health services utilization.PloS one · 2017Trial
- Economic evaluation of an alternative drug to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine as intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy.PloS one · 2015Trial
- Cost-effectiveness of ward-based pharmacy care in surgical patients: protocol of the SUREPILL (Surgery & Pharmacy In Liaison) study.BMC health services research · 2011Trial
- Costs of eprosartan versus diuretics for treatment of hypertension in a geriatric population: an observational, open-label, multicentre study.Drugs & aging · 2009Trial
- Clinical-pharmacological medication reviews for insurants of a German statutory health insurance fund (Kaufmännische Krankenkasse (KKH)): a 5-year retrospective analysis (2019-2023).Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of chemotherapy-induced adverse drug reactions among children with cancer in Africa.Infectious agents and cancer · 2025Review
- Medication reviews by emergency department pharmacists in patients hospitalised for an adverse drug event: a cost study.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Estimating the economic effect of harm associated with high risk prescribing of oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in England: population based cohort and economic modelling study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2024Article
- Risk factors associated with nocebo effects: A review of reviews.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2024Review
- Digital Technology Applications in the Management of Adverse Drug Reactions: Bibliometric Analysis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Frail Patients with Heart Failure: Clinical Experience of a Heart Failure Unit.Drugs & aging · 2023Article
- Incidence and Economic Burden of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalization: A Prospective Study in Korea.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Article
- Trends in computerized provider order entry: 20-year bibliometric overview.Frontiers in digital health · 2023Review
- Real-World Patient Characteristics, Utilization Patterns, and Outcomes of US Patients with HR+, HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with Abemaciclib.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2022Article
- Artificial Intelligent Context-Aware Machine-Learning Tool to Detect Adverse Drug Events from Social Media Platforms.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although most commonly used drugs cause adverse effects, some of them with potentially serious consequences, relatively little is known about their economic impact. The purpose of this review is to summarise information describing the cost of treatment of drug-induced adverse effects as an additional cost of pharmaceutical treatment. The focus of this study was limited to the overall economic impact of drug-related morbidity and to the economic analysis of a single class of drugs with different safety profiles. Several studies carried out in the US have investigated adverse drug effects experienced by hospitalised patients and their impact on hospital costs. Patients who developed adverse effects were hospitalised an average of 1.2-3.8 days longer than patients who did not, with additional hospital costs of $US2284-5640 per patient (2000 values). Other research studies in different countries have quantified the incidence and economic consequences of adverse drug effects that occur in the ambulatory setting and that generate hospital admission and emergency department visits. They have shown that preventable adverse effects constitute between 43.3% and 80% of all adverse outcomes leading to emergency visits and hospital admissions, and disproportionately increase healthcare costs. Finally, a recent estimation revealed that in the US the cost of problems linked to drug use in the ambulatory setting exceeded $US177 billion in the year 2000.NSAIDs constitute a widely used class of drugs and they are one of the leading drug classes in causing adverse effects. The acquisition costs of the drugs, as well as the costs for prevention and treatment of adverse effects, determine their cost-effectiveness ratio. Depending on the incidence and severity of adverse effects, the cost per adverse effect avoided ranges from $US215 to $US35 459 (2000 values). According to the contingent valuation methodology, willingness to pay to avoid or reduce the incidence of adverse effects is an indicator of the value individuals associate with the impact of such effects on their well-being. Individuals are willing to pay annually an average of $US240 and $US350, respectively, to avoid vomiting and gastrointestinal distress induced by NSAIDs. Although the results of the different studies reviewed are not strictly comparable because of differences in the severity of adverse effects, the perspective of the analysis, the cost data included and the cost component considered, the data show that, apart from the implications for health, a substantial quantity of resources are used to treat adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.