Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12805168›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2003

How important is personal care in general practice?

Carolyn Tarrant, Kate Windridge, Mary Boulton, Richard Baker, George Freeman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
18.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The patient-doctor relationship: a synthesis of the qualitative literature on patients' perspectives.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Pooled it
  3. What do patients and clinicians think about continuity in general practice in England? a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Wholistic Health Care: Evolutionary Conceptual Analysis.Journal of religion and health · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Factors affecting the physician-patient relationship of older veterans with inadequate health literacy: an observational study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Interpretive medicine: Supporting generalism in a changing primary care world.Occasional paper (Royal College of General Practitioners) · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Carolyn TarrantClinical Governance Research and Development Unit, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Leicester, Leicester LE5 4PW. Tarrant ccp3@le.ac.uk
Kate Windridge
Mary Boulton
Richard Baker
George Freeman
Primary Health Care · QAImperial College London · GBOxford Brookes University · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore patients' perceptions of the features of personal care and how far these are shared by healthcare providers; whether a continuing relationship between a health professional and a patient is essential for personal care; and the circumstances in which a continuing relationship is important.

designQualitative analysis of semistructured interviews using the "framework" approach.

settingSix general practices in Leicestershire.

participants40 patients aged > or = 18 years, 13 general practitioners, 10 practice and community nurses, and six practice administrative staff, recruited through participating practices.

resultsPatients' and healthcare providers' accounts cited human communication, individualised treatment or management, and whole person care as features of personal care. Personal care was described in three different contexts-a continuing relationship, a single consultation, and from the practice as a whole. The extent to which a continuing relationship was important for personal care was determined by the reason for consulting, as well as patients' consulting history and lifestyle.

conclusionsPatients, general practitioners, primary care nurses, and administrative staff hold similar views on the meaning of personal care, despite differences of emphasis reflecting their different roles. Personal care is promoted by but not always dependent on a continuing provider-patient relationship; human communication and individualised care emerged as important in making care personal whatever the context. Most respondents valued relationships in primary care and had clear ideas about when care in the context of a relationship was most valuable.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsAdolescentAdultCommunicationContinuity of Patient CareFamily PracticeFemaleHolistic HealthHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPersonal Health ServicesProfessional Patient Relationship

Identifiers

PMID12805168
PMCPMC161634
OpenAlexW2003705545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.