Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12804859›Full record

ArticleVaccine2003

Oral immunization of cattle with hemagglutinin protein of rinderpest virus expressed in transgenic peanut induces specific immune responses.

Abha Khandelwal, G Lakshmi Sita, M S Shaila

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Plant production of veterinary vaccines and therapeutics.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2009
    Review
  14. Transgenic plants for animal health: plant-made vaccine antigens for animal infectious disease control.Phytochemistry reviews : proceedings of the Phytochemical Society of Europe · 2008
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abha KhandelwalDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, India.
G Lakshmi Sita
M S Shaila
Indian Institute of Science Bangalore · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rinderpest is an acute, highly contagious often fatal disease of large and small ruminants, both domestic and wild. Global eradication of rinderpest needs a robust, safe and cost-effective vaccine. The causative agent, rinderpest virus (RPV) is an important member of the genus Morbillivirus in the Paramyxoviridae family. We have generated transgenic peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) plants expressing hemagglutinin protein of RPV and report here, the induction of immune responses in cattle following oral feeding with transgenic leaves expressing hemagglutinin protein without oral adjuvant. Hemagglutinin-specific antibody was detected in the serum as confirmed by immunohistochemical staining of virus-infected cells, and in vitro neutralization of virus infectivity. Oral delivery also resulted in cell-mediated immune responses.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, OralAnimalsAntibodies, ViralAntibody FormationAntigens, ViralArachisCattleCell DivisionChlorocebus aethiopsHemagglutininsImmunization ScheduleImmunohistochemistryLymphocytesNeutralization TestsPlants, Genetically ModifiedAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralHemagglutininsVaccines, SyntheticViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID12804859
PMCPMC7126942
OpenAlexW2153807053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.