SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003
Bile acids for primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of primary sclerosing cholangitis (2021)].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2022Guideline
- Bile acids for primary sclerosing cholangitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Bile acids for liver-transplanted patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Glucocorticosteroids for primary sclerosing cholangitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Bile acids for viral hepatitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2007Pooled it
- D-penicillamine for primary sclerosing cholangitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006Pooled it
- Fenofibrate in primary sclerosing cholangitis; a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2022Trial
- Primary sclerosing cholangitis: diagnostic and management challenges.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2017Review
- A network meta-analysis of the efficacy and side effects of UDCA-based therapies for primary sclerosing cholangitis.Oncotarget · 2015Article
- Molecular mechanisms of ursodeoxycholic acid toxicity & side effects: ursodeoxycholic acid freezes regeneration & induces hibernation mode.International journal of molecular sciences · 2012Review
- Current management of primary sclerosing cholangitis in pediatric patients.Paediatric drugs · 2011Review
- Primary sclerosing cholangitis--what is the difference between east and west?World journal of gastroenterology · 2008Review
- Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment of vanishing bile duct syndromes.World journal of gastroenterology · 2006Review
- Therapeutic benefit of sulfasalazine for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.Journal of gastroenterology · 2006Article
- Treatment of Biliary Problems in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBile acids have been used for treating primary sclerosing cholangitis, but their beneficial and harmful effects remain unclear.
objectivesTo assess the beneficial and harmful effects of bile acids for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group's Trials Register, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Chinese Biomedical Database generally from inception through to May 2002. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials comparing any dose or duration of bile acids versus placebo, no intervention, or another intervention were included. Trials were included irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers extracted the data. The methodological quality of the trials was evaluated with respect to the generation of the allocation sequence, allocation concealment, double blinding, and follow-up. The results were reported by intention-to-treat analysis. The outcomes were presented as relative risks (RR) or weighted mean differences (WMD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN
resultsWe identified six randomised clinical trials, all with low methodological quality. Patients were treated for three months to six years (median two years). Five trials (183 patients) compared ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo, and one trial (40 patients) compared ursodeoxycholic acid versus no treatment. Ursodeoxycholic acid did not significantly reduce the risk of death (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.27 to 2.73); treatment failure including liver transplantation, varices, ascites, and encephalopathy (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.63 to 1.42); liver histological deterioration (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.45 to 1.74); or liver cholangiographic deterioration (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.18 to 1.02). Ursodeoxycholic acid significantly improved serum bilirubin (WMD -14.6 micro mol/litre; 95% CI -18.7 to -10.6), alkaline phosphatases (WMD -506 IU/litre; 95% CI -583 to -430), aspartate aminotransferase (WMD -46 IU/litre; 95% CI -77 to -16), and gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (WMD -260 IU/litre; 95% CI -315 to -205), but not albumin (WMD -0.20 g/litre; 95% CI -1.91 to 1.50). Ursodeoxycholic acid was well tolerated. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsUrsodeoxycholic acid leads to a significant improvement in liver biochemistry, but there is insufficient evidence to either support or refute its clinical effects in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Large scale, high-quality randomised clinical trials are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.