SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003
The effectiveness of psychosocial interventions delivered by general practitioners.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for adults with substance use disorder that have a co-occurring mental health disorder: an umbrella review and illustrative cost-effectiveness analysis.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Consultation letters for medically unexplained physical symptoms in primary care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- The impact of brief alcohol interventions in primary healthcare: a systematic review of reviews.Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire)Pooled it
- Effect of Immediate Referral vs a Brief Problem-solving Intervention for Screen-Detected Peripartum Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Problem-Solving Education to Prevent Depression Among Low-Income Mothers: A Path Mediation Analysis in a Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Cost-effectiveness of problem-solving treatment in comparison with usual care for primary care patients with mental health problems: a randomized trial.BMC family practice · 2012Trial
- Problem-solving education to prevent depression among low-income mothers of preterm infants: a randomized controlled pilot trial.Archives of women's mental health · 2011Trial
- Potential impact of trauma on the ability to prevent depression among low-income mothers.Depression and anxiety · 2011Trial
- Primary care patients with mental health problems: outcome of a randomised clinical trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007Trial
- Predictors of quitting among African American light smokers enrolled in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.Journal of general internal medicine · 2006Trial
- Adaptation of problem-solving treatment for prevention of depression among low-income, culturally diverse mothers.Family & community healthTrial
- Identifying patients with psychosocial problems in general practice: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2021Article
- From efficacy to effectiveness and beyond: what next for brief interventions in primary care?Frontiers in psychiatry · 2014Review
- The effects of mental practice in neurological rehabilitation; a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2013Article
- Functional interpretations of sadness, stress and demoralization among an urban population of low-income mothers.Maternal and child health journal · 2010Article
- A coping and communication support intervention tailored to older patients diagnosed with late-stage cancer.Clinical interventions in aging · 2008Review
- Process evaluation for complex interventions in primary care: understanding trials using the normalization process model.BMC family practice · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany patients visit their general practitioner (GP) because of problems that are psychosocial in origin. However, for many of these problems there is no evidence-based treatment available in primary care, and these patients place time-consuming demands on their GP. Therefore, GPs could benefit from tools to help these patients more effectively and efficiently. In this light, it is important to assess whether structured psychosocial interventions might be an appropriate tool for GPs. Previous reviews have shown that psychosocial interventions in primary care seem more effective that usual care. However, these interventions were mostly performed by health professionals other than the GP.
objectivesTo present a systematic review of the literature addressing the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions by general practitioners by assessing the clinical outcomes and the methodological quality of selected studies. SEARCH STRATEGY: The literature search was conducted using the CCDAN Trials Register, the Cochrane Library and reference lists of relevant studies for citation tracking. Also, personal communication with experts took place. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials and controlled patient preference trials addressing the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions by GPs for any problem or disorder. Studies published before January 2002 were eligible for entry. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Methodological quality was independently be assessed by two reviewers using the Maastricht-Amsterdam Criteria List and the CCDAN Quality Rating Scale. The qualitative and quantitative characteristics of selected trials were independently extracted by two reviewers using a standardised data extraction form. Levels of evidence were used to determine the strength of the evidence available. Results from studies that reported similar interventions and outcome measures were meta-analysed. MAIN
resultsEight studies were included in the review. Selected studies addressed different psychosocial interventions for four distinct disorders or health complaints. There is good evidence that problem-solving treatment by general practitioners is effective for major depression. The evidence concerning the remaining interventions for other health complaints (reattribution or cognitive behavioural group therapy for somatisation, counselling for smoking cessation, behavioural interventions to reduce alcohol reduction) is either limited or conflicting. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsIn general, there is little available evidence on the use of psychosocial interventions by general practitioners. Of the psychosocial interventions reviewed, problem-solving treatment for depression seems the most promising tool for GPs, although a stronger evidence-base is required and the effectiveness in routine practice remains to be demonstrated. More research is required to improve the evidence-base on this subject.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.