SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003
Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03936842 (Evaluation of an Educational Intervention for Women With Breast Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 96 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of an Educational Intervention for Women With Breast Pain
Who cites it
96 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 369 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing women's stated preferences for breast cancer screening: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.BMC health services research · 2024Pooled it
- Early detection of self-breast examination using smartphone breast application.Breast disease · 2024Pooled it
- Training health workers in clinical breast examination for early detection of breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- The Impact of Breast Awareness on the Early Detection of Breast Cancer in Young Women: A Systematic Review.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Pooled it
- Global epidemiology of breast cancer based on risk factors: a systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Breast self-examination practice and its determinants among women in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Effectiveness of clinical breast examination as a 'stand-alone' screening modality: an overview of systematic reviews.BMC cancer · 2020Pooled it
- Systematic reviews as a 'lens of evidence': Determinants of benefits and harms of breast cancer screening.International journal of cancer · 2019Pooled it
- Interventions for raising breast cancer awareness in women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Screening for breast cancer with mammography.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in average-risk women aged 40-74 years.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2011Guideline
- Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Annals of internal medicine · 2009Pooled it
- Breast cancer guidelines for Uganda (2nd Edition 2008).African health sciences · 2008Guideline
- Benefits of breast self-examinations for medically underserved populations: A systematic review.Women's health (London, England)Pooled it
- Effects of hands-on breast self-examination training on knowledge, health beliefs, and BSE practice among female university students: a randomized controlled trial.BMC women's health · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Random Cross-Sectional Determination of the Level of Awareness Among Female Saudi Patients About Breast Cancer.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2016Trial
- A randomised controlled trial of an intervention to promote early presentation of breast cancer in older women: effect on breast cancer awareness.British journal of cancer · 2009Trial
- Association of Pre-Diagnosis Breast Assessment Practices and Risk Factors with Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Healthcare Utilization and Inequalities in Breast Cancer Early Detection Behaviors Among Women in Türkiye: A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast self-examination and clinical breast examination have been promoted for many years as general screening methods to diagnose breast cancer at an earlier stage in order to decrease morbidity and or mortality. The possible benefits and harms remain unclear.
objectivesTo determine whether screening for breast cancer by regular self-examination or clinical breast examination reduces breast cancer mortality and morbidity. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Library and Medline were searched for randomised trials; date of last search October 2002. The specialised register maintained by the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group was searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials, including cluster randomised trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Decisions on which trials to include were taken independently by the reviewers based on the methods of trial. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. Intention to treat analyses were conducted using a fixed effect model with 95% confidence intervals. MAIN
resultsTwo large population-based studies (388,535 women) from Russia and Shanghai that compared breast self-examination with no intervention were included. There was no statistically significant difference in breast cancer mortality, relative risk 1.05 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90 to 1.24) (587 deaths in total). In Russia, more cancers were found in the breast self-examination group than in the control group (relative risk 1.24, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.41), while this was not the case in Shanghai (relative risk 0.97, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.06). Almost twice as many biopsies (3406) with benign results were performed in the screening group compared to the control group (1856), relative risk 1.89, 95% CI 1.79 to 2.00. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsData from two large trials do not suggest a beneficial effect of screening by breast self-examination whereas there is evidence for harms. There were no randomised trials of clinical breast examination. At present, breast self-examination cannot be recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.