SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003
Specialist nurses in diabetes mellitus.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 142 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Medication Reviews Conducted by Pharmacists on Cardiovascular Diseases Risk Factors in Ambulatory Care.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Pooled it
- Effectiveness of chronic care models for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2017Pooled it
- Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Improving quality of care for persons with diabetes: an overview of systematic reviews - what does the evidence tell us?Systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Nurse versus physician-led care for the management of asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Specialized nursing practice for chronic disease management in the primary care setting: an evidence-based analysis.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2013Pooled it
- Individual patient education for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- A meta-analysis of interventions to improve care for chronic illnesses.The American journal of managed care · 2005Pooled it
- Trial
- Integrating education, group support, and case management for diabetic Hispanics.Ethnicity & disease · 2011Trial
- Article
- Comparing core competencies for diabetes specialist nurses across different countries: a scoping review.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- The Implication of Diabetes-Specialized Nurses in Aiming for the Better Treatment and Management of Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Brief Narrative Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2024Review
- Close intervention sessions complement intensive insulin therapy in paediatric diabetes: a longitudinal study.Archives of disease in childhood · 2023Article
- Article
- Using a mixed method to develop consensus-based aims, contents, intended learning outcomes, teaching, and evaluation methods for a course on epilepsy for postgraduate or continuing education in community health nursing programs.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- Influence of the Model of Care on the Outcomes of Diabetes Self-Management Education Program: A Scoping Review.Journal of diabetes research · 2021Article
- [The project delegation-international experiences and studies].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2020Article
- Impact of Motivational Interviewing on Self-Management in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2020Article
- Care managers can be useful for patients with depression but their role must be clear: a qualitative study of GPs' experiences.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe patient with diabetes has many different learning needs relating to diet, monitoring, and treatments. In many health care systems specialist nurses provide much of these needs, usually aiming to empower patients to self-manage their diabetes. The present review aims to assess the effects of the involvement of specialist nurse care on outcomes for people with diabetes, compared to usual care in hospital clinics or primary care with no input from specialist nurses.
objectivesTo assess the effects of diabetes specialist nurses / nurse case manager in diabetes on the metabolic control of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. SEARCH STRATEGY: We carried out a comprehensive search of databases including the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify trials. Bibliographies of relevant papers were searched, and hand searching of relevant publications was undertaken to identify additional trials (Date of last search November 2002). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials of the effects of a specialist nurse practitioner on short and long term diabetic outcomes were included in the review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three investigators performed data extraction and quality scoring independently; any discrepancies were resolved by consensus. MAIN
resultsSix trials including 1382 participants followed for six to 12 months were included. Two trials were in adolescents. Due to substantial heterogeneity between trials a meta-analysis was not performed. Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the intervention groups was not found to be significantly different from the control groups over a 12 month follow up period. One study demonstrated a significant reduction in HbA1c in the presence of the diabetes specialist nurse/nurse case manager at 6 months. Significant differences in episodes of hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia between intervention and control groups were found in one trial. Where reported, emergency admissions and quality of life were not found to be significantly different between groups. No information was found regarding BMI, mortality, long term diabetic complications, adverse effects, or costs. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThe presence of a diabetes specialist nurse / nurse case manager may improve patients' diabetic control over short time periods, but from currently available trials the effects over longer periods of time are not evident. There were no significant differences overall in hypoglycaemic episodes, hyperglycaemic incidents, or hospital admissions. Quality of life was not shown to be affected by input from a diabetes specialist nurse/nurse case manager.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.